GeForce G200 vs GeForce 7650 GS
GeForce G200
Popular choices:
GeForce 7650 GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce G200 is positioned at rank 357 and the GeForce 7650 GS is on rank 702, so the GeForce G200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce G200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7650 GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce G200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 7650 GS.
| Insight | GeForce G200 | GeForce 7650 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce G200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce G200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce G200 | GeForce 7650 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Valorant
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce G200 and GeForce 7650 GS
GeForce G200
The GeForce G200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 136 points. Launch price was $79.
GeForce 7650 GS
The GeForce 7650 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 967 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 134 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce G200 scores 136 and the GeForce 7650 GS reaches 134 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G200 is built on Pascal while the GeForce 7650 GS uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G200) vs 768 (GeForce 7650 GS).
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce 7650 GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 136+1% | 134 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 768+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce 7650 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce 7650 GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce G200) vs 9.0c (GeForce 7650 GS). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce 7650 GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1+12% | 9.0c |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3+57% | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce G200) vs No (GeForce 7650 GS). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs No. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce G200) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce 7650 GS).
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce 7650 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP4) | No |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce G200 draws 30W versus the GeForce 7650 GS's 30W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 7650 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G200) vs 350W (GeForce 7650 GS). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce 7650 GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce G200 launched at $299 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 7650 GS launched at $150 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.1 (GeForce G200) vs 8.9 (GeForce 7650 GS) — the GeForce G200 offers 2.2% better value. The GeForce G200 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce 7650 GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $150-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.1+2% | 8.9 |
| Codename | GP108 | N14P-GT |
| Release | May 17 2017 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #641 | #616 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce G200 and GeForce 7650 GS
