GeForce G200 vs RADEON HD 6350

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G200 vs RADEON HD 6350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G200 vs RADEON HD 6350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G200

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 186W, a 156W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RADEON HD 6350 across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
896.7% HIGHER MSRP
$299 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 4.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

RADEON HD 6350

2011

Why buy it

✅5.2% more average FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $269 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 933.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.7 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌520% higher power demand at 186W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON HD 6350 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.2% in average FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (141 vs 136), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce G200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON HD 6350 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $269 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 933.3% (4.7 vs 0.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON HD 6350 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce G200 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce G200 vs RADEON HD 6350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G200

The GeForce G200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 136 points. Launch price was $79.

RADEON HD 6350

The RADEON HD 6350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 141 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce G200 scores 136 and the RADEON HD 6350 reaches 141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G200 is built on Pascal while the RADEON HD 6350 uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G200) vs 1,280 (RADEON HD 6350). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G200) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (RADEON HD 6350).

Feature	GeForce G200	RADEON HD 6350
G3D Mark Score	136	141+4%
Architecture	Pascal	TeraScale 3
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS	1.92 TFLOPS+70%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L1 Cache	144 KB	320 KB+122%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON HD 6350 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce G200	RADEON HD 6350
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G200 and 128-bit on the RADEON HD 6350.

Feature	GeForce G200	RADEON HD 6350
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce G200) vs 11.2 (11_0) (RADEON HD 6350). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce G200	RADEON HD 6350
DirectX	10.1	11.2 (11_0)+11%
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
OpenGL	3.3	4.4+33%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce G200) vs None (RADEON HD 6350). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce G200) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (RADEON HD 6350).

Feature	GeForce G200	RADEON HD 6350
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP4)	UVD 2.2
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G200 draws 30W versus the RADEON HD 6350's 186W — a 144.4% difference. The GeForce G200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G200) vs 350W (RADEON HD 6350). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70.

Feature	GeForce G200	RADEON HD 6350
TDP	30W-84%	186W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	168mm	168mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	75	70-7%
Perf/Watt	4.5+463%	0.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce G200 came in at $299, while the RADEON HD 6350 launched at $30. On MSRP, RADEON HD 6350 was 90% cheaper ($269 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (GeForce G200) vs 4.7 (RADEON HD 6350) — the RADEON HD 6350 offers 840% better value. The newer card here is GeForce G200 (2017 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce G200	RADEON HD 6350
MSRP	$299	$30-90%
Performance per Dollar	0.5	4.7+840%
Codename	GP108	Cayman
Release	May 17 2017	December 1 2011
Ranking	#641	#598

Search GeForce G200 on Amazon

Search RADEON HD 6350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.