G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce G200 vs Quadro NVS 420 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce G200 vs Quadro NVS 420: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce G200

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro NVS 420 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro NVS 420

2018

Why buy it

✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅GeForce G200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro NVS 420 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Measures 160mm instead of 168mm, a 8mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro NVS 420 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (137 vs 136), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro NVS 420 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce G200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce G200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro NVS 420 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce G200 vs Quadro NVS 420 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G200

The GeForce G200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 136 points. Launch price was $79.

Quadro NVS 420

The Quadro NVS 420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1647 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 137 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce G200 scores 136 and the Quadro NVS 420 reaches 137 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce G200 is built on Pascal while the Quadro NVS 420 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G200) vs 2,304 (Quadro NVS 420). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G200) vs 7.589 TFLOPS (Quadro NVS 420). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1647 MHz.

Feature	GeForce G200	Quadro NVS 420
G3D Mark Score	136	137
Architecture	Pascal	Pascal
Process Node	14 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	384	2304+500%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS	7.589 TFLOPS+573%
Boost Clock	1468 MHz	1647 MHz+12%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	24	144+500%
L1 Cache	144 KB	864 KB+500%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce G200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro NVS 420 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce G200	Quadro NVS 420
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce G200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro NVS 420 carries 4 GB. Quadro NVS 420 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G200 and 64-bit on the Quadro NVS 420. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce G200) vs 2 MB (Quadro NVS 420) — the Quadro NVS 420 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce G200	Quadro NVS 420
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	4 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce G200) vs 10_0 (Quadro NVS 420). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce G200	Quadro NVS 420
DirectX	10.1	10_0
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce G200) vs PureVideo HD (Quadro NVS 420). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs PureVideo HD.

Feature	GeForce G200	Quadro NVS 420
Encoder	None	PureVideo HD
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP4)	PureVideo HD
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce G200 draws 30W versus the Quadro NVS 420's 100W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce G200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G200) vs 350W (Quadro NVS 420). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 160mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce G200	Quadro NVS 420
TDP	30W-70%	100W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	160mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	4.5+221%	1.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce G200 came in at $299, while the Quadro NVS 420 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro NVS 420 was 100+% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (GeForce G200) vs Infinity (Quadro NVS 420) — the Quadro NVS 420 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro NVS 420 (2018 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce G200	Quadro NVS 420
MSRP	$299	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.5	Infinity
Codename	GP108	GP104
Release	May 17 2017	February 21 2018
Ranking	#641	#266

Search GeForce G200 on Amazon

Search Quadro NVS 420 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.