
GeForce G200

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce G200 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce G200 vs GeForce RTX 3060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce G200 vs GeForce RTX 3060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce G200
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 170W, a 140W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 242mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅4951.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 11256.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌466.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 30W.
- ❌44% longer card at 242mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce G200 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G200
The GeForce G200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 136 points. Launch price was $79.

GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce G200 scores 136 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 12396.3%. The GeForce G200 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G200) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G200) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 136 | 16,995+12396% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 3584+833% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+1030% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1777 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 24 | 112+367% |
| L1 Cache | 0.14 MB | 3.5 MB+2400% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce G200 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce G200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G200 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce G200) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 12 GB+2300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 360 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce G200) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 Ultimate+19% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce G200) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce G200) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP4) | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce G200 draws 30W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 140% difference. The GeForce G200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G200) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-82% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 4.5 | 100.0+2122% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce G200 came in at $299, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329. On MSRP, GeForce G200 was 9.1% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (GeForce G200) vs 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 10240% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-9% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.5 | 51.7+10240% |
| Codename | GP108 | GA106 |
| Release | May 17 2017 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #641 | #114 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














