
GeForce G200

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce G200 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce G200 vs GeForce RTX 3070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce G200 vs GeForce RTX 3070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce G200
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 220W, a 190W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 242mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.5 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅6217.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 9668.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌633.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 30W.
- ❌44% longer card at 242mm vs 168mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce G200 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce G200
The GeForce G200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 136 points. Launch price was $79.

GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce G200 scores 136 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 16202.9%. The GeForce G200 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce G200) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G200) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 136 | 22,172+16203% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 5888+1433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+1702% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1725 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 16 | 96+500% |
| TMUs | 24 | 184+667% |
| L1 Cache | 0.14 MB | 5.8 MB+4043% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce G200 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce G200 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 3070 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce G200 and 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce G200) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 8 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce G200) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.4. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 Ultimate+19% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce G200) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce G200) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP4) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce G200 draws 30W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 152% difference. The GeForce G200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce G200) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-86% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.5 | 100.8+2140% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce G200 came in at $299, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. On MSRP, GeForce G200 was 40.1% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (GeForce G200) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 8780% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3070 (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce G200 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-40% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.5 | 44.4+8780% |
| Codename | GP108 | GA104 |
| Release | May 17 2017 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #641 | #63 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














