GeForce Go 6200
VS
GeForce 7000M

GeForce Go 6200 vs GeForce 7000M

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6200

2012Core: 902 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 7000M

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 6200 is positioned at rank 325 and the GeForce 7000M is on rank 735, so the GeForce Go 6200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6200

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
4836%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4646%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
4592%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4584%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4575%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
4549%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
4491%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4475%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4433%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
4421%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
4368%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4359%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
4280%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4277%
#310
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
5333%
#325
GeForce Go 6200
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#326
GeForce 7300 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
93%
#327
Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $40
87%
#329
GeForce 7950 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
77%
#330
RADEON X550XT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $40
75%
#334
Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
57%
#335
RADEON X550
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
57%
#337
Radeon HD 8350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $39
55%
#339
Radeon X1950 GT
MSRP: $140|Avg: $49
51%
#340
GeForce 6600 GT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $50
48%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7000M

#725
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
41758%
#727
37854%
#728
37754%
#732
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
34331%
#733
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
34096%
#735
GeForce 7000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#736
GeForce FX 5500
MSRP: $37|Avg: $30
85%
#737
RADEON 9500
MSRP: $179|Avg: $30
77%
#738
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
77%
#739
RADEON X850 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
62%
#740
RADEON 9800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
58%
#742
RADEON 9000
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
38%
#743
RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
38%
#744
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
31%
#745
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
23%
#746
MOBILITY RADEON 9000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
23%
#747
GeForce4 MX 420
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
19%
#748
RADEON 9250
MSRP: $79|Avg: $25
15%
#749
RADEON 9200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
15%
#750
GeForce 256
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
12%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce Go 6200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 15.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 7000M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce Go 6200GeForce 7000M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+15.4%)
Lower raw frame rates (-15.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+1462.5%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 6200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 6200 and GeForce 7000M

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6200

The GeForce Go 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15 points. Launch price was $99.

NVIDIA

GeForce 7000M

The GeForce 7000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 6200 scores 15 versus the GeForce 7000M's 13 — the GeForce Go 6200 leads by 15.4%. The GeForce Go 6200 is built on Kepler while the GeForce 7000M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 6200) vs 384 (GeForce 7000M). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6200) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 7000M).

FeatureGeForce Go 6200GeForce 7000M
G3D Mark Score
15+15%
13
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6927 TFLOPS
0.9032 TFLOPS+30%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
32 KB
192 KB+500%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce Go 6200GeForce 7000M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 6200 comes with 16 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 7000M has 256 MB. The GeForce 7000M offers 1462.5% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce Go 6200) vs 1 MB (GeForce 7000M) — the GeForce 7000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce Go 6200GeForce 7000M
VRAM Capacity
0.016 GB
0.25 GB+1462%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce Go 6200) vs 9.0c (GeForce 7000M). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce Go 6200GeForce 7000M
DirectX
10.0+11%
9.0c
Vulkan
None
None
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
Max Displays
1
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 6200) vs No (GeForce 7000M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce Go 6200) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce 7000M).

FeatureGeForce Go 6200GeForce 7000M
Encoder
No
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 6200 draws 65W versus the GeForce 7000M's 33W — a 65.3% difference. The GeForce 7000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6200) vs 350W (GeForce 7000M). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce Go 6200GeForce 7000M
TDP
65W
33W-49%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
0.2
0.4+100%