GeForce Go 6200
VS
GeForce FX 5200SE

GeForce Go 6200 vs GeForce FX 5200SE

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6200

2012Core: 902 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200SE

2012Core: 736 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 6200 is positioned at rank 325 and the GeForce FX 5200SE is on rank 373, so the GeForce Go 6200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6200

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
4836%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4646%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
4592%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4584%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4575%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
4549%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
4491%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4475%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4433%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
4421%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
4368%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
4359%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
4280%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
4277%
#310
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
5333%
#325
GeForce Go 6200
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#326
GeForce 7300 GT
MSRP: $89|Avg: $20
93%
#327
Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $40
87%
#329
GeForce 7950 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
77%
#330
RADEON X550XT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $40
75%
#334
Radeon X1650 Pro
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
57%
#335
RADEON X550
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
57%
#337
Radeon HD 8350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $39
55%
#339
Radeon X1950 GT
MSRP: $140|Avg: $49
51%
#340
GeForce 6600 GT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $50
48%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5200SE

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
60450%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
58075%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
57400%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
57300%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
57183%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
56858%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
56142%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
55933%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
55417%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
55267%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
54600%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
54483%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
53500%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
53467%
#358
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
66667%
#373
GeForce FX 5200SE
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
100%
#374
RADEON 9800 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $30
92%
#375
GeForce FX 5200
MSRP: $70|Avg: $25
92%
#376
GeForce PCX 5300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
83%
#377
GeForce FX 5900
MSRP: $399|Avg: $20
75%
#378
GeForce FX 5600 Ultra
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
75%
#379
GeForce FX 5100
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
67%
#380
GeForce FX 5600XT
MSRP: $129|Avg: $10
58%
#381
GeForce FX 5600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $10
58%
#382
GeForce3 Ti 200
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
25%
#383
GeForce4 Ti 4200
MSRP: $199|Avg: $5
25%
#384
GeForce4 Ti 4600
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
17%
#385
GeForce4 MX 460
MSRP: $179|Avg: $15
17%
#386
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
17%
#387
GeForce4 Ti 4400
MSRP: $299|Avg: $49
17%
#388
GeForce4 Ti 4800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
17%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce Go 6200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 25% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce FX 5200SE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce Go 6200GeForce FX 5200SE
Performance
Leading raw performance (+25%)
Lower raw frame rates (-25%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+3025%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 6200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 6200 and GeForce FX 5200SE

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6200

The GeForce Go 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15 points. Launch price was $99.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200SE

The GeForce FX 5200SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12 points. Launch price was $89.99.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 6200 scores 15 versus the GeForce FX 5200SE's 12 — the GeForce Go 6200 leads by 25%. The GeForce Go 6200 is built on Kepler while the GeForce FX 5200SE uses Rankine, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 6200) vs 288 (GeForce FX 5200SE). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6200) vs 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200SE).

FeatureGeForce Go 6200GeForce FX 5200SE
G3D Mark Score
15+25%
12
Architecture
Kepler
Rankine
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384+33%
288
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6927 TFLOPS
0.8479 TFLOPS+22%
ROPs
16
24+50%
TMUs
32
48+50%
L1 Cache
32 KB
384 KB+1100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
384 KB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce Go 6200GeForce FX 5200SE
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 6200 comes with 16 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5200SE has 512 MB. The GeForce FX 5200SE offers 3025% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce Go 6200) vs 384 KB (GeForce FX 5200SE) — the GeForce FX 5200SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce Go 6200GeForce FX 5200SE
VRAM Capacity
0.016 GB
0.5 GB+3025%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
384 KB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce Go 6200) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200SE). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce Go 6200GeForce FX 5200SE
DirectX
10.0+11%
9.0a
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
2.1+40%
1.5
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 6200) vs None (GeForce FX 5200SE). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce Go 6200) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5200SE).

FeatureGeForce Go 6200GeForce FX 5200SE
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
None
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 6200 draws 65W versus the GeForce FX 5200SE's 150W — a 79.1% difference. The GeForce Go 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6200) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5200SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70.

FeatureGeForce Go 6200GeForce FX 5200SE
TDP
65W-57%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
100mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
70-7%
Perf/Watt
0.2+100%
0.1