GeForce Go 7200
VS
Radeon Xpress 1300M

GeForce Go 7200 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7200

2014Core: 993 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Xpress 1300M

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1250 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 7200 is positioned at rank 307 and the Radeon Xpress 1300M is on rank 363, so the GeForce Go 7200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7200

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
3224%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
3097%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
3061%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3056%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
3050%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
3032%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
2994%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2983%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2956%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
2948%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
2912%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
2906%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
2853%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
2852%
#292
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
3556%
#307
GeForce Go 7200
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#308
Radeon HD 3850
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
100%
#309
Radeon HD 4200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#310
Radeon HD 4270
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#312
Radeon E6460
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
96%
#313
Radeon HD 6290
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
93%
#314
GeForce GTX 280
MSRP: $649|Avg: $649
88%
#315
Radeon HD 3470
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
87%
#316
Radeon HD 3000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
85%
#317
Radeon HD 6250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
84%
#318
GeForce GT 120
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
84%
#319
GeForce 6600 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
76%
#320
Radeon HD 3670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
75%
#321
Radeon HD 3200
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
73%
#322
Radeon HD 2350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $48
68%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Xpress 1300M

#348
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
18016%
#363
Radeon Xpress 1300M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#364
Quadro FX 1800
MSRP: $489|Avg: $100
99%
#365
FirePro 3D V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80
98%
#366
FirePro 3D V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229
98%
#367
Quadro 5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100
96%
#368
FirePro V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250
95%
#369
FirePro V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $20
95%
#370
FirePro 3D V8750
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500
87%
#371
FirePro 3D V7750
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
83%
#372
GRID M10-2B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80
80%
#373
Quadro FX 370
MSRP: $129|Avg: $500
79%
#374
Quadro 6000
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150
74%
#375
GRID M6-0B
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
74%
#376
RTXA5000-6Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
74%
#377
GRID M10-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
73%
#378
Tesla K40c
MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500
71%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon Xpress 1300M uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Xpress 1300M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 7200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce Go 7200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 12.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Xpress 1300M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce Go 7200Radeon Xpress 1300M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+12.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-12.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+693.7%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 7200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 7200 and Radeon Xpress 1300M

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7200

The GeForce Go 7200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $89.

AMD

Radeon Xpress 1300M

The Radeon Xpress 1300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 7200 scores 45 versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 40 — the GeForce Go 7200 leads by 12.5%. The GeForce Go 7200 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Xpress 1300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 7200) vs 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7200) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300M).

FeatureGeForce Go 7200Radeon Xpress 1300M
G3D Mark Score
45+13%
40
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
384
1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS
3.2 TFLOPS+320%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
80+150%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce Go 7200Radeon Xpress 1300M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 7200 comes with 65 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Xpress 1300M has 512 MB. The Radeon Xpress 1300M offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce Go 7200) vs 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300M) — the Radeon Xpress 1300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce Go 7200Radeon Xpress 1300M
VRAM Capacity
0.063 GB
0.5 GB+694%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce Go 7200Radeon Xpress 1300M
Max Displays
1
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce Go 7200) vs None (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Decoder: PureVideo vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7200) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon Xpress 1300M).

FeatureGeForce Go 7200Radeon Xpress 1300M
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
PureVideo
None
Codecs
MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7200 draws 64W versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 85W — a 28.2% difference. The GeForce Go 7200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7200) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce Go 7200Radeon Xpress 1300M
TDP
64W-25%
85W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
0.7+40%
0.5