GeForce Go 7200 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 7200 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 7200 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 7200

2014

Why buy it

✅+12.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Draws 64W instead of 85W, a 21W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 65 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 65 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Xpress 1300M

2019

Why buy it

✅693.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 65 MB).
✅GeForce Go 7200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Xpress 1300M is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (40 vs 45).
❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌32.8% higher power demand at 85W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce Go 7200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 12.5% in PassMark G3D (45 vs 40), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Xpress 1300M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 65 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce Go 7200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce Go 7200 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Xpress 1300M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce Go 7200 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 7200

The GeForce Go 7200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon Xpress 1300M

The Radeon Xpress 1300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 7200 scores 45 versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 40 — the GeForce Go 7200 leads by 12.5%. The GeForce Go 7200 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Xpress 1300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 7200) vs 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7200) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300M).

Feature	GeForce Go 7200	Radeon Xpress 1300M
G3D Mark Score	45+13%	40
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7626 TFLOPS	3.2 TFLOPS+320%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 7200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Xpress 1300M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce Go 7200	Radeon Xpress 1300M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 7200 has 65 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Xpress 1300M carries 512 MB. Radeon Xpress 1300M gives you 693.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7200 and 64-bit on the Radeon Xpress 1300M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce Go 7200) vs 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300M) — the Radeon Xpress 1300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce Go 7200	Radeon Xpress 1300M
VRAM Capacity	0.063 GB	0.5 GB+694%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce Go 7200	Radeon Xpress 1300M
Max Displays	1	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce Go 7200) vs None (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Decoder: PureVideo vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7200) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon Xpress 1300M).

Feature	GeForce Go 7200	Radeon Xpress 1300M
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	PureVideo	None
Codecs	MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7200 draws 64W versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 85W — a 28.2% difference. The GeForce Go 7200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7200) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.