G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 7900 GTX vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 7900 GTX vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 7900 GTX

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅2996.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅3100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 256 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2996.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 8289.3% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 270), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce Go 7900 GTX is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 34 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce Go 7900 GTX vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 7900 GTX

The GeForce Go 7900 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 270 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 7900 GTX scores 270 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 8289.3%. The GeForce Go 7900 GTX is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (GeForce Go 7900 GTX) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7900 GTX) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 2535 MHz.

Feature	GeForce Go 7900 GTX	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
G3D Mark Score	270	22,651+8289%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2816	4352+55%
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.06 TFLOPS	22.06 TFLOPS+264%
Boost Clock	1075 MHz	2535 MHz+136%
ROPs	96+100%	48
TMUs	176+29%	136
L1 Cache	1 MB	4.3 MB+330%
L2 Cache	3 MB	32 MB+967%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce Go 7900 GTX does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce Go 7900 GTX is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce Go 7900 GTX	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 7900 GTX has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives you 3100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7900 GTX and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce Go 7900 GTX) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce Go 7900 GTX	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	8 GB+3100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	288 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB	32 MB+967%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7900 GTX) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce Go 7900 GTX	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
DirectX	9.0c	12.2+36%
Vulkan	None	1.3
OpenGL	2.1	4.6+119%
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 7900 GTX) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7900 GTX) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).

Feature	GeForce Go 7900 GTX	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Encoder	No	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	PureVideo	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7900 GTX draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7900 GTX) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce Go 7900 GTX	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
TDP	250W	160W-36%
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	0mm	240mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	70°C-18%
Perf/Watt	1.1	141.6+12773%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce Go 7900 GTX	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP	—	$399
Codename	GM200	AD106
Release	June 2 2015	May 18 2023
Ranking	#179	#59

Search GeForce Go 7900 GTX on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.