GeForce GT 220M
VS
GeForce GT 120M

GeForce GT 220M vs GeForce GT 120M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 220M

2013Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 120M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 220M is positioned at rank 358 and the GeForce GT 120M is on rank 124, so the GeForce GT 120M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 220M

#348
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1012%
#350
917%
#351
915%
#355
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
832%
#356
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
826%
#358
GeForce GT 220M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#359
Radeon R7 M350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#360
GeForce 920MX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $54
99%
#361
99%
#362
Radeon HD 7670A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
98%
#363
Radeon Vega 8
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
97%
#367
GeForce 615
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
94%
#369
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
93%
#370
GeForce GT 730A
MSRP: $75|Avg: $20
92%
#372
Radeon HD 7660G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
90%
#373
Radeon R7 M270DX
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 120M

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
720%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
692%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
684%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
683%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
681%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
678%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
669%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
667%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
660%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
659%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
651%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
649%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
638%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
637%
#84
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
98%
#85
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
93%
#109
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
794%
#124
GeForce GT 120M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#125
Radeon HD 8650G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
100%
#126
GeForce GT 630
MSRP: $69|Avg: $20
99%
#127
Radeon HD 6770
MSRP: $129|Avg: $129
98%
#129
GeForce GT 440
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
97%
#130
Radeon R7 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
96%
#133
Radeon HD 6750
MSRP: $109|Avg: $109
95%
#135
Radeon R5 240
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
94%
#136
Radeon R5 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
94%
#137
Radeon HD 8570
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
94%
#139
GeForce GT 730
MSRP: $89|Avg: $45
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 220M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 120M.

InsightGeForce GT 220MGeForce GT 120M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+6.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-6.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 220M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 220M and GeForce GT 120M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 220M

The GeForce GT 220M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 161 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 120M

The GeForce GT 120M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 151 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 220M scores 161 versus the GeForce GT 120M's 151 — the GeForce GT 220M leads by 6.6%. The GeForce GT 220M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 120M uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 220M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 120M). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 220M) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 120M). Boost clocks: 967 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 220MGeForce GT 120M
G3D Mark Score
161+7%
151
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7427 TFLOPS
1.127 TFLOPS+52%
Boost Clock
967 MHz
1468 MHz+52%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
32 KB
144 KB+350%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 220MGeForce GT 120M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 220M) vs 512 KB (GeForce GT 120M) — the GeForce GT 120M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 220MGeForce GT 120M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 220M) vs 11.1 (FL10_0) (GeForce GT 120M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 220MGeForce GT 120M
DirectX
10.0
11.1 (FL10_0)+11%
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 220M) vs VP3 (GeForce GT 120M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 220M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 120M).

FeatureGeForce GT 220MGeForce GT 120M
Encoder
No
VP3
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
VP3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 220M draws 50W versus the GeForce GT 120M's 30W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GT 120M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 220M) vs 350W (GeForce GT 120M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 220MGeForce GT 120M
TDP
50W
30W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80°C
Perf/Watt
3.2
5.0+56%