GeForce GT 240M vs Mobility Radeon HD 545v

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 240M

2012Core: Up to 625 MHzBoost: 645 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 545v

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 240M vs Mobility Radeon HD 545v Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 240M vs Mobility Radeon HD 545v: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 240M

2012

Why buy it

  • Draws 32W instead of 50W, a 18W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

Mobility Radeon HD 545v

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 56.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 32W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 240M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 6% in PassMark G3D (212 vs 200), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 240M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 545v makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 545v is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 240M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 240M vs Mobility Radeon HD 545v Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 240M

The GeForce GT 240M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 625 MHz to 645 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 212 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 545v

The Mobility Radeon HD 545v is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 200 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 240M scores 212 versus the Mobility Radeon HD 545v's 200 — the GeForce GT 240M leads by 6%. The GeForce GT 240M is built on Kepler while the Mobility Radeon HD 545v uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 240M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 545v). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 240M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 545v).

FeatureGeForce GT 240MMobility Radeon HD 545v
G3D Mark Score
212+6%
200
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.48 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS+133%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
32 KB
80 KB+150%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 240M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 545v leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 240MMobility Radeon HD 545v
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 240M and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 545v.

FeatureGeForce GT 240MMobility Radeon HD 545v
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 240M) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 545v). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 240MMobility Radeon HD 545v
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)+10%
10.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
0
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 240M) vs None (Mobility Radeon HD 545v). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 240M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Mobility Radeon HD 545v).

FeatureGeForce GT 240MMobility Radeon HD 545v
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP4)
UVD 2.2
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 240M draws 32W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 545v's 50W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce GT 240M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 240M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 545v). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 70.

FeatureGeForce GT 240MMobility Radeon HD 545v
TDP
32W-36%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
70
70
Perf/Watt
6.6+65%
4.0
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 240M (2012 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GT 240MMobility Radeon HD 545v
MSRP
$49
Codename
GK107
Broadway
Release
March 22 2012
January 7 2010
Ranking
#909
#846

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.