
GeForce GT 240M

Radeon HD 6380G
GeForce GT 240M vs Radeon HD 6380G Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 240M vs Radeon HD 6380G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 240M vs Radeon HD 6380G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 240M
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 32W instead of 186W, a 154W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6380G across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
Radeon HD 6380G
2011Why buy it
- ✅30.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌481.3% higher power demand at 186W vs 32W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 240M vs Radeon HD 6380G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 240M
The GeForce GT 240M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 625 MHz to 645 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 212 points.

Radeon HD 6380G
The Radeon HD 6380G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 201 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 240M scores 212 versus the Radeon HD 6380G's 201 — the GeForce GT 240M leads by 5.5%. The GeForce GT 240M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6380G uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 240M) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6380G). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 240M) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6380G).
| Feature | GeForce GT 240M | Radeon HD 6380G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 212+5% | 201 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1280+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.48 TFLOPS | 1.92 TFLOPS+300% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 320 KB+900% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 240M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6380G leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 240M | Radeon HD 6380G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 240M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6380G carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 240M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 240M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6380G. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 240M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6380G) — the Radeon HD 6380G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 240M | Radeon HD 6380G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 240M) vs 11 (Radeon HD 6380G). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GT 240M | Radeon HD 6380G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 11 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 240M) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6380G). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs UVD 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 240M | Radeon HD 6380G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP4) | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 240M draws 32W versus the Radeon HD 6380G's 186W — a 141.3% difference. The GeForce GT 240M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 240M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6380G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GT 240M | Radeon HD 6380G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 32W-83% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 6.6+500% | 1.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GT 240M (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GT 240M | Radeon HD 6380G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $50 |
| Codename | GK107 | Cayman |
| Release | March 22 2012 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #909 | #598 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














