GeForce GT 240M vs Radeon HD 6380G

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 240M

2012Core: Up to 625 MHzBoost: 645 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6380G

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 240M vs Radeon HD 6380G Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 240M vs Radeon HD 6380G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 240M vs Radeon HD 6380G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 240M

2012

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 32W instead of 186W, a 154W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6380G across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6380G

2011

Why buy it

  • 30.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 481.3% higher power demand at 186W vs 32W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6380G is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 30.3% in average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 240M instead at 212 vs 201, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 240M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6380G makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6380G is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 240M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 240M vs Radeon HD 6380G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 240M

The GeForce GT 240M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 625 MHz to 645 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 212 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6380G

The Radeon HD 6380G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 201 points. Launch price was $180.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 240M scores 212 versus the Radeon HD 6380G's 201 — the GeForce GT 240M leads by 5.5%. The GeForce GT 240M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6380G uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 240M) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6380G). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 240M) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6380G).

FeatureGeForce GT 240MRadeon HD 6380G
G3D Mark Score
212+5%
201
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 3
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.48 TFLOPS
1.92 TFLOPS+300%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
80+150%
L1 Cache
32 KB
320 KB+900%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 240M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6380G leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 240MRadeon HD 6380G
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 240M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6380G carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 240M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 240M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6380G. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 240M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6380G) — the Radeon HD 6380G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 240MRadeon HD 6380G
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 240M) vs 11 (Radeon HD 6380G). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GT 240MRadeon HD 6380G
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
11
Max Displays
0
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 240M) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6380G). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs UVD 3.

FeatureGeForce GT 240MRadeon HD 6380G
Encoder
None
UVD 3
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP4)
UVD 3
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 240M draws 32W versus the Radeon HD 6380G's 186W — a 141.3% difference. The GeForce GT 240M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 240M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6380G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GT 240MRadeon HD 6380G
TDP
32W-83%
186W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
1mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
6.6+500%
1.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 240M (2012 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GT 240MRadeon HD 6380G
MSRP
$50
Codename
GK107
Cayman
Release
March 22 2012
December 1 2011
Ranking
#909
#598

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.