GeForce GT 415M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5165

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 415M

2013Core: 549 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 5165

2010Core: 700 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 415M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5165 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 415M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5165: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 415M

2013

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $49 MSRP).

Mobility Radeon HD 5165

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 415M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (286 vs 284), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 415M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Mobility Radeon HD 5165 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Mobility Radeon HD 5165 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 415M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 415M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5165 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 415M

The GeForce GT 415M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 286 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 5165

The Mobility Radeon HD 5165 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 284 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 415M scores 286 and the Mobility Radeon HD 5165 reaches 284 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 415M is built on Kepler while the Mobility Radeon HD 5165 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 415M) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 5165). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 415M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 5165).

FeatureGeForce GT 415MMobility Radeon HD 5165
G3D Mark Score
286
284
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4216 TFLOPS
1.12 TFLOPS+166%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
32 KB
80 KB+150%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 415M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 5165 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 415MMobility Radeon HD 5165
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 415M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 5165 carries 1 GB. Mobility Radeon HD 5165 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 415M and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 5165.

FeatureGeForce GT 415MMobility Radeon HD 5165
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 415M) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 5165). OpenGL: 4.0 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 415MMobility Radeon HD 5165
DirectX
11.0+9%
10.1
OpenGL
4.0+21%
3.3
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 415M draws 45W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 5165's 50W — a 10.5% difference. The GeForce GT 415M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 415M) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 5165). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 415MMobility Radeon HD 5165
TDP
45W-10%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
6.4+12%
5.7
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 415M (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GT 415MMobility Radeon HD 5165
MSRP
$49
Codename
GK107
Broadway
Release
April 1 2013
January 7 2010
Ranking
#857
#846

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.