GeForce GT 415M vs Radeon HD 6520G

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 415M

2013Core: 549 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6520G

2010Boost: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 415M vs Radeon HD 6520G Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 415M vs Radeon HD 6520G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 415M vs Radeon HD 6520G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 415M

2013

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 200W, a 155W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6520G across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $40 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6520G

2010

Why buy it

  • 60.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($40 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 344.4% higher power demand at 200W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6520G is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 60.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.9% in PassMark G3D (300 vs 286), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 415M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6520G makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6520G is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 415M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 415M vs Radeon HD 6520G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 415M

The GeForce GT 415M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 286 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6520G

The Radeon HD 6520G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 300 points. Launch price was $299.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 415M scores 286 and the Radeon HD 6520G reaches 300 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 415M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6520G uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 415M) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 6520G). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 415M) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6520G).

FeatureGeForce GT 415MRadeon HD 6520G
G3D Mark Score
286
300+5%
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 3
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
1408+267%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4216 TFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS+434%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
88+175%
L1 Cache
32 KB
352 KB+1000%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 415M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6520G leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 415MRadeon HD 6520G
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 415M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6520G. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 415M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6520G) — the Radeon HD 6520G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 415MRadeon HD 6520G
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 415M draws 45W versus the Radeon HD 6520G's 200W — a 126.5% difference. The GeForce GT 415M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 415M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6520G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GT 415MRadeon HD 6520G
TDP
45W-78%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
6.4+327%
1.5
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 415M (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GT 415MRadeon HD 6520G
MSRP
$40
Codename
GK107
Cayman
Release
April 1 2013
December 14 2010
Ranking
#857
#623

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.