GeForce GT 415M
VS
Radeon R5 235X

GeForce GT 415M vs Radeon R5 235X

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 415M

2013Core: 549 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 235X

2014Boost: 1000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 415M is positioned at rank 311 and the Radeon R5 235X is on rank 209, so the Radeon R5 235X offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 415M

#63
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600
98%
#301
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
759%
#303
688%
#304
686%
#308
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
624%
#309
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
620%
#311
GeForce GT 415M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#312
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3500C
MSRP: $99|Avg: $30
100%
#314
GeForce GT 720A
MSRP: $40|Avg: $40
99%
#315
GeForce MX110
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
99%
#321
GeForce 940A
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
97%
#323
Radeon RX 640
MSRP: $159|Avg: $55
96%
#326
Iris Pro Graphics P580
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 235X

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1284%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1233%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1219%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1217%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1215%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1208%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1192%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1188%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1177%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1174%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1160%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1157%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1136%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1136%
#193
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1416%
#208
Radeon R7 A360
MSRP: $109|Avg: $55
100%
#209
Radeon R5 235X
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
100%
#210
Radeon HD 7290
MSRP: $20|Avg: $5
99%
#211
Radeon HD 8210
MSRP: $35|Avg: $5
99%
#212
Radeon HD 8330
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#213
GeForce GT 420
MSRP: $79|Avg: $79
97%
#214
GeForce GT 520
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
97%
#215
Radeon HD4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $15
97%
#216
GeForce GTX 275
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
96%
#218
Radeon HD 7400G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
95%
#219
Radeon HD 7480D
MSRP: $53|Avg: $30
94%
#220
Radeon HD 7520G
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
93%
#221
Radeon HD 8350G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
91%
#222
Radeon HD 6480G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
91%
#223
GeForce GT 415
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 415M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R5 235X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GT 415MRadeon R5 235X
Performance
Leading raw performance (+3.2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 415M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 415M and Radeon R5 235X

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 415M

The GeForce GT 415M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 286 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 235X

The Radeon R5 235X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 277 points. Launch price was $99.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 415M scores 286 and the Radeon R5 235X reaches 277 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 415M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 235X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 415M) vs 640 (Radeon R5 235X). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 415M) vs 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 235X).

FeatureGeForce GT 415MRadeon R5 235X
G3D Mark Score
286+3%
277
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4216 TFLOPS
1.216 TFLOPS+188%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
32 KB
160 KB+400%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 415MRadeon R5 235X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 415M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 235X has 1 GB. The Radeon R5 235X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 415MRadeon R5 235X
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 415M) vs 11.2 (Radeon R5 235X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 415MRadeon R5 235X
DirectX
11.0
11.2+2%
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 415M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 235X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 3.1.

FeatureGeForce GT 415MRadeon R5 235X
Encoder
No
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
UVD 3.1
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 415M draws 45W versus the Radeon R5 235X's 80W — a 56% difference. The GeForce GT 415M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 415M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 235X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GT 415MRadeon R5 235X
TDP
45W-44%
80W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
6.4+83%
3.5
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R5 235X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 415MRadeon R5 235X
MSRP
$49
Avg Price (30d)
$15
Codename
GK107
Cape Verde
Release
April 1 2013
February 13 2014
Ranking
#857
#655