GeForce GT 435M vs FirePro 3D V7750

GeForce GT 435M

2013Core: 549 MHz

FirePro 3D V7750

2014Core: 850 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GT 435M

536

0.0%

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

FirePro 3D V7750

274

545

+1.7%

Radeon HD 2900 GT

Mobility Radeon HD 565v

Radeon R5 M230

Mobility Radeon HD 5000 Serisi

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 435M is positioned at rank 204 and the FirePro 3D V7750 is on rank 371, so the GeForce GT 435M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 435M

#194

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

405%

#196

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

367%

#197

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

366%

#201

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

333%

#202

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

331%

#204

GeForce GT 435M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#206

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

98%

#208

Radeon RX Vega M GL

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

97%

#212

GeForce GTX 780M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

96%

#216

Radeon 8040S

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

91%

#217

Radeon R7 +8G

MSRP: $49|Avg: $20

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V7750

#356

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

21725%

#371

FirePro 3D V7750

MSRP: $799|Avg: $20

100%

#372

GRID M10-2B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80

97%

#373

Quadro FX 370

MSRP: $129|Avg: $500

96%

#374

RTXA5000-6Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

90%

#375

GRID M6-0B

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

90%

#376

Quadro 6000

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150

90%

#377

GRID M10-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150

88%

#378

Tesla K40c

MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500

85%

#379

Tesla M2090

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40

82%

#380

Quadro FX 4800

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80

82%

#381

GRID K2

MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80

78%

#382

GRID K180Q

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000

78%

#383

Quadro CX

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500

69%

#384

GRID P100-8Q

MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550

65%

#385

Quadro FX 550

MSRP: $150|Avg: $10

63%

#386

Quadro FX 350

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

63%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro 3D V7750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 435M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GT 435M	FirePro 3D V7750
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro 3D V7750 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 435M Benchmark Check

FirePro 3D V7750 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 435M and FirePro 3D V7750

GeForce GT 435M

The GeForce GT 435M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 536 points.

FirePro 3D V7750

The FirePro 3D V7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 545 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 435M scores 536 and the FirePro 3D V7750 reaches 545 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 435M is built on Kepler while the FirePro 3D V7750 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 435M) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7750). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 435M) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7750).

Feature	GeForce GT 435M	FirePro 3D V7750
G3D Mark Score	536	545+2%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4216 TFLOPS	3.482 TFLOPS+726%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	128+300%
L1 Cache	32 KB	512 KB+1500%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 435M	FirePro 3D V7750
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 435M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V7750 has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 435M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 435M) vs 768 KB (FirePro 3D V7750) — the FirePro 3D V7750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 435M	FirePro 3D V7750
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 435M) vs 10.1 (FirePro 3D V7750). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 435M	FirePro 3D V7750
DirectX	11.0+9%	10.1
Vulkan	None	None
OpenGL	4.0+21%	3.3
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 435M) vs UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V7750). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 435M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V7750).

Feature	GeForce GT 435M	FirePro 3D V7750
Encoder	No	UVD 2
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	UVD 2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 435M draws 45W versus the FirePro 3D V7750's 274W — a 143.6% difference. The GeForce GT 435M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 435M) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V7750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 234mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 435M	FirePro 3D V7750
TDP	45W-84%	274W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	234mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	11.9+495%	2.0