GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs FirePro 3D V7750

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

#27

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $380

111%

#28

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB

MSRP: $269|Avg: $318

110%

#29

Radeon RX 6700 XT

MSRP: $479|Avg: $230

110%

#30

GeForce RTX 3060

MSRP: $329|Avg: $289

110%

#31

Radeon RX 7400

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

109%

#32

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

109%

#33

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

107%

#34

Radeon RX 5300

MSRP: $129|Avg: $50

105%

#35

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

MSRP: $150|Avg: $77

104%

#36

Radeon RX 6400

MSRP: $159|Avg: $139

104%

#37

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

MSRP: $599|Avg: $330

104%

#38

Arc A750

MSRP: $289|Avg: $229

103%

#39

Radeon RX 6800

MSRP: $579|Avg: $370

102%

#40

GeForce RTX 3060 8GB

MSRP: $329|Avg: $280

101%

#41

Radeon RX 6750 XT

MSRP: $549|Avg: $320

101%

#42

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

MSRP: $799|Avg: $590

100%

#43

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB

MSRP: $429|Avg: $429

99%

#44

GeForce RTX 5070

MSRP: $549|Avg: $550

98%

#45

Radeon RX 7600 XT

MSRP: $329|Avg: $330

98%

#46

GeForce RTX 2050

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

96%

#47

GeForce RTX 3080

MSRP: $699|Avg: $400

96%

#48

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

MSRP: $499|Avg: $449

95%

#49

Radeon RX 7900 GRE

MSRP: $549|Avg: $540

94%

#50

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

MSRP: $599|Avg: $600

93%

#51

Radeon RX 7800 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $490

92%

#52

GeForce RTX 3060 12GB

MSRP: $329|Avg: $340

92%

#53

GeForce RTX 4070

MSRP: $599|Avg: $550

91%

#54

Radeon RX 7650 GRE

MSRP: $279|Avg: $380

91%

#55

GeForce RTX 2060 12GB

MSRP: $470|Avg: $120

90%

#56

Arc A770

MSRP: $349|Avg: $280

89%

#57

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

MSRP: $289|Avg: $423

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V7750

#356

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

21725%

#371

FirePro 3D V7750

MSRP: $799|Avg: $20

100%

#372

GRID M10-2B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80

97%

#373

Quadro FX 370

MSRP: $129|Avg: $500

96%

#374

RTXA5000-6Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500

90%

#375

GRID M6-0B

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

90%

#376

Quadro 6000

MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150

90%

#377

GRID M10-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150

88%

#378

Tesla K40c

MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500

85%

#379

Tesla M2090

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40

82%

#380

Quadro FX 4800

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80

82%

#381

GRID K2

MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80

78%

#382

GRID K180Q

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000

78%

#383

Quadro CX

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500

69%

#384

GRID P100-8Q

MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550

65%

#385

Quadro FX 550

MSRP: $150|Avg: $10

63%

#386

Quadro FX 350

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

63%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 3D V7750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5694.1% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (12 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V7750.

Insight	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	FirePro 3D V7750
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+5694.1%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-5694.1%)
Longevity	🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	🎮 High Capacity (12 GB)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	Standard Size (285mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $590 (vs $20), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 96.4% better value per dollar than the FirePro 3D V7750.

Insight	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	FirePro 3D V7750
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+96.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590)	✅More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Benchmark Check

FirePro 3D V7750 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and FirePro 3D V7750

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.

FirePro 3D V7750

The FirePro 3D V7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 545 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the FirePro 3D V7750's 545 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 5694.1%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the FirePro 3D V7750 uses GCN 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7750). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7750).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	FirePro 3D V7750
G3D Mark Score	31,578+5694%	545
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 1.0
Process Node	4 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	7680+275%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	40.09 TFLOPS+1051%	3.482 TFLOPS
ROPs	80+150%	32
TMUs	240+88%	128
L1 Cache	7.5 MB+1400%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	48 MB+6300%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The FirePro 3D V7750 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro 3D V7750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	FirePro 3D V7750
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.0 (Native)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V7750 has 1 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 0.75 MB (FirePro 3D V7750) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	FirePro 3D V7750
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+1100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	48 MB+6300%	0.75 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 10.1 (FirePro 3D V7750). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	FirePro 3D V7750
DirectX	12 Ultimate+19%	10.1
Vulkan	1.3	None
OpenGL	4.6+39%	3.3
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs UVD 2 (FirePro 3D V7750). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs UVD 2. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V7750).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	FirePro 3D V7750
Encoder	NVENC (8th Gen)	UVD 2
Decoder	NVDEC (5th Gen)	UVD 2
Codecs	AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the FirePro 3D V7750's 274W — a 3.9% difference. The FirePro 3D V7750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V7750). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 234mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070 Ti	FirePro 3D V7750
TDP	285W	274W-4%
Recommended PSU	700W	350W-50%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	285mm	234mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	110.8+5440%	2.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $590, while the FirePro 3D V7750 launched at $799 and now averages $20. The FirePro 3D V7750 costs 96.6% less ($570 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 27.3 (FirePro 3D V7750) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 96% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).