GeForce GT 440 vs Quadro 2000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 440 vs Quadro 2000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 440 vs Quadro 2000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 440

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 2000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌16.4% higher power demand at 64W vs 55W.

Quadro 2000M

2015

Why buy it

✅61.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 55W instead of 64W, a 9W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro 2000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 61.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 440 instead at 770 vs 758, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 440 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 440 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro 2000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 440 vs Quadro 2000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 440

The GeForce GT 440 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 770 points. Launch price was $89.

Quadro 2000M

The Quadro 2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1098 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 758 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 440 scores 770 and the Quadro 2000M reaches 758 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 440 is built on Kepler while the Quadro 2000M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 440) vs 640 (Quadro 2000M). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 440) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000M).

Feature	GeForce GT 440	Quadro 2000M
G3D Mark Score	770+2%	758
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7626 TFLOPS	1.405 TFLOPS+84%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	32 KB	320 KB+900%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 440 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 2000M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 440	Quadro 2000M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 440 and 64-bit on the Quadro 2000M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 440) vs 2 MB (Quadro 2000M) — the Quadro 2000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 440	Quadro 2000M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 440 draws 64W versus the Quadro 2000M's 55W — a 15.1% difference. The Quadro 2000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 440) vs 350W (Quadro 2000M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GT 440	Quadro 2000M
TDP	64W	55W-14%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	145mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65	—
Perf/Watt	12.0	13.8+15%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro 2000M (2015 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GT 440	Quadro 2000M
MSRP	$79	—
Codename	GK107	GM107
Release	May 29 2014	December 3 2015
Ranking	#777	#550

Search GeForce GT 440 on Amazon

Search Quadro 2000M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.