GeForce GT 440 vs Radeon HD 4810
GeForce GT 440
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 4810
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 440 is positioned at rank 129 and the Radeon HD 4810 is on rank 113, so the Radeon HD 4810 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 440
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4810
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 4810 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 440 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GT 440 | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (246mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 4810 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 4810 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $40), it costs 63% less, resulting in a 168.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 440 | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+168.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 440 and Radeon HD 4810
GeForce GT 440
The GeForce GT 440 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 770 points. Launch price was $89.
Radeon HD 4810
The Radeon HD 4810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 440 scores 770 and the Radeon HD 4810 reaches 775 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 440 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 4810 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 440) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4810). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 440) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4810).
| Feature | GeForce GT 440 | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 770 | 775 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS | 1.36 TFLOPS+78% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 160 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 440 | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 440 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4810 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 440 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 440 | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (11_0) (GeForce GT 440) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4810). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 440 | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 (11_0)+9% | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 440) vs None (Radeon HD 4810). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 440) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (Radeon HD 4810).
| Feature | GeForce GT 440 | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP4) | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 440 draws 64W versus the Radeon HD 4810's 190W — a 99.2% difference. The GeForce GT 440 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 440) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4810). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 246mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 65 vs 95.
| Feature | GeForce GT 440 | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W-66% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 145mm | 246mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65-32% | 95 |
| Perf/Watt | 12.0+193% | 4.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 440 launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon HD 4810 launched at $70 and now averages $15. The Radeon HD 4810 costs 62.5% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.3 (GeForce GT 440) vs 51.7 (Radeon HD 4810) — the Radeon HD 4810 offers 167.9% better value. The GeForce GT 440 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GT 440 | Radeon HD 4810 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79 | $70-11% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $15-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.3 | 51.7+168% |
| Codename | GK107 | RV790 |
| Release | May 29 2014 | April 2 2009 |
| Ranking | #777 | #762 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 440 and Radeon HD 4810
