CPU
GPU
GeForce GT 440
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 A365
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 440 is positioned at rank 129 and the Radeon R7 A365 is on rank 412, so the GeForce GT 440 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 440
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A365
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 A365 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 440 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GT 440 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 440 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 440 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $55), it costs 27% less, resulting in a 35.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 440 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+35.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($55) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 440 and Radeon R7 A365
GeForce GT 440
The GeForce GT 440 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 770 points. Launch price was $89.
Radeon R7 A365
The Radeon R7 A365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 781 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 440 scores 770 and the Radeon R7 A365 reaches 781 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 440 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 A365 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 440) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A365). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 440) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A365).
| Feature | GeForce GT 440 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 770 | 781+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS+20% | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 96 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 440 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 440 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A365 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 440 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 440 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (11_0) (GeForce GT 440) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon R7 A365). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 440 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 (11_0) | 12 (FL 12_0)+9% |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 440) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 A365). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 440) vs H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 A365).
| Feature | GeForce GT 440 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP4) | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 440 draws 64W versus the Radeon R7 A365's 30W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon R7 A365 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 440) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A365). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 440 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W | 30W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.0 | 26.0+117% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 440 launched at $79 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon R7 A365 launched at $109 and now averages $55. The GeForce GT 440 costs 27.3% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 19.3 (GeForce GT 440) vs 14.2 (Radeon R7 A365) — the GeForce GT 440 offers 35.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GT 440 | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $79-28% | $109 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-27% | $55 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.3+36% | 14.2 |
| Codename | GK107 | Opal |
| Release | May 29 2014 | January 9 2014 |
| Ranking | #777 | #890 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 440 and Radeon R7 A365
