GeForce GT 440 vs Radeon R7 A10-8850

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 440 vs Radeon R7 A10-8850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 440 vs Radeon R7 A10-8850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 440

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $171 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 215.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.7 vs 3.1 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A10-8850 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌16.4% higher power demand at 64W vs 55W.

Radeon R7 A10-8850

2016

Why buy it

✅7.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 55W instead of 64W, a 9W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
216.5% HIGHER MSRP
$250 MSRPvs$79 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.1 vs 9.7 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 A10-8850 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (773 vs 770), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 440 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 440 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $171 cheaper on MSRP at $79 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 215.2% (9.7 vs 3.1), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R7 A10-8850 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 440 vs Radeon R7 A10-8850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 440

The GeForce GT 440 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 770 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon R7 A10-8850

The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 6 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 773 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 440 scores 770 and the Radeon R7 A10-8850 reaches 773 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 440 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 A10-8850 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 440) vs 512 (Radeon R7 A10-8850). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 440) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A10-8850).

Feature	GeForce GT 440	Radeon R7 A10-8850
G3D Mark Score	770	773
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7626 TFLOPS	0.8192 TFLOPS+7%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	32 KB	128 KB+300%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 440 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 A10-8850 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 440	Radeon R7 A10-8850
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 440 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A10-8850 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 440 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 440 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A10-8850.

Feature	GeForce GT 440	Radeon R7 A10-8850
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 440 draws 64W versus the Radeon R7 A10-8850's 55W — a 15.1% difference. The Radeon R7 A10-8850 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 440) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A10-8850). Power connectors: None vs None.

Feature	GeForce GT 440	Radeon R7 A10-8850
TDP	64W	55W-14%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	None
Length	145mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65	—
Perf/Watt	12.0	14.1+17%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 440 came in at $79, while the Radeon R7 A10-8850 launched at $250. On MSRP, GeForce GT 440 was 68.4% cheaper ($171 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.7 (GeForce GT 440) vs 3.1 (Radeon R7 A10-8850) — the GeForce GT 440 offers 212.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 A10-8850 (2016 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GT 440	Radeon R7 A10-8850
MSRP	$79-68%	$250
Performance per Dollar	9.7+213%	3.1
Codename	GK107	Cape Verde
Release	May 29 2014	July 6 2016
Ranking	#777	#667

Search GeForce GT 440 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A10-8850 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.