CPU
GPU
GeForce GT 620M
Popular choices:
FirePro M2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 620M is positioned at rank 192 and the FirePro M2000 is on rank 323, so the GeForce GT 620M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 620M
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M2000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 620M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M2000.
| Insight | GeForce GT 620M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 620M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 620M and FirePro M2000
GeForce GT 620M
The GeForce GT 620M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 432 points.
FirePro M2000
The FirePro M2000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 1 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 426 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 620M scores 432 and the FirePro M2000 reaches 426 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 620M is built on Kepler while the FirePro M2000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 620M) vs 640 (FirePro M2000). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 620M) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (FirePro M2000).
| Feature | GeForce GT 620M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 432+1% | 426 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 640+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7296 TFLOPS | 1.024 TFLOPS+40% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 160 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 620M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 620M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro M2000 has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 620M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 620M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL11_0) (GeForce GT 620M) vs 11.1 (FirePro M2000). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GT 620M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL11_0)+8% | 11.1 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 620M) vs UVD 3 (FirePro M2000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 620M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 (FirePro M2000).
| Feature | GeForce GT 620M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 Part 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 620M draws 45W versus the FirePro M2000's 43W — a 4.5% difference. The FirePro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 620M) vs 350W (FirePro M2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 620M | FirePro M2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W | 43W-4% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 9.6 | 9.9+3% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 620M and FirePro M2000
