GeForce GT 620M vs GeForce 800A

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 620M is positioned at rank 192 and the GeForce 800A is on rank 504, so the GeForce GT 620M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 620M

#182

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

377%

#184

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

342%

#185

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

341%

#189

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

310%

#190

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

308%

#192

GeForce GT 620M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#195

GeForce GT625M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45

98%

#197

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

97%

#203

GeForce GT 730M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45

93%

#206

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 800A

#494

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

2496%

#496

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

2263%

#497

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

2257%

#501

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

2052%

#502

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

2038%

#504

GeForce 800A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

100%

#505

Mobility Radeon HD 4850

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

100%

#506

Radeon HD 7520G + HD 8750M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

100%

#507

Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

99%

#508

Radeon R7 M460

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

98%

#509

Mobility Radeon HD 3870

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

98%

#510

GeForce 9800 S

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

97%

#511

Radeon HD 8650G + HD 7670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

97%

#512

Radeon HD 8650G + 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

97%

#513

Radeon HD 8510G + HD 8500M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

97%

#514

Radeon HD 7660D

MSRP: $122|Avg: $15

97%

#515

Radeon HD 8650G + 8500M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

96%

#516

Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire

MSRP: $800|Avg: $150

95%

#517

GeForce 8200

MSRP: $40|Avg: $5

94%

#518

Mobility Radeon HD 545v

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

94%

#519

GeForce 9500M G

MSRP: $30|Avg: $30

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 800A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 620M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GT 620M	GeForce 800A
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+300%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 800A remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 620M Benchmark Check

GeForce 800A Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 620M and GeForce 800A

GeForce GT 620M

The GeForce GT 620M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 432 points.

GeForce 800A

The GeForce 800A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 435 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 620M scores 432 and the GeForce 800A reaches 435 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 620M is built on Kepler while the GeForce 800A uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 620M) vs 256 (GeForce 800A). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 620M) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 800A). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1150 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GT 620M	GeForce 800A
G3D Mark Score	432	435
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384+50%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7296 TFLOPS+24%	0.5888 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	950 MHz	1150 MHz+21%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+100%	16
L1 Cache	32 KB	128 KB+300%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 620M	GeForce 800A
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 620M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 800A has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 620M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 620M) vs 1 MB (GeForce 800A) — the GeForce 800A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 620M	GeForce 800A
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	1 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL11_0) (GeForce GT 620M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 800A). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 620M	GeForce 800A
DirectX	12 (FL11_0)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	None	N/A
OpenGL	4.1	4.6+12%
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 620M) vs NVENC (GeForce 800A). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 620M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 800A).

Feature	GeForce GT 620M	GeForce 800A
Encoder	No	NVENC
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	VP5
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 620M draws 45W versus the GeForce 800A's 33W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce 800A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 620M) vs 350W (GeForce 800A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.