GeForce GT 630 vs FirePro M7740
GeForce GT 630
Popular choices:
FirePro M7740
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 630 is positioned at rank 126 and the FirePro M7740 is on rank 329, so the GeForce GT 630 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 630
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M7740
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GT 630 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2012). The GeForce GT 630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro M7740 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro M7740.
| Insight | GeForce GT 630 | FirePro M7740 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 630 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $500 for the FirePro M7740, it costs 96% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 2475.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 630 | FirePro M7740 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2475.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 630 and FirePro M7740
GeForce GT 630
The GeForce GT 630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 685 points.
FirePro M7740
The FirePro M7740 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 665 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 630 scores 685 and the FirePro M7740 reaches 665 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 630 is built on Turing while the FirePro M7740 uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GT 630) vs 512 (FirePro M7740). Raw compute: 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 630) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M7740).
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | FirePro M7740 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 685+3% | 665 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.828 TFLOPS+164% | 0.6912 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | FirePro M7740 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 630 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro M7740 has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 630 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GT 630) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro M7740) — the GeForce GT 630 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | FirePro M7740 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 630) vs 10.1 (FirePro M7740). Vulkan: 1.0 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | FirePro M7740 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+19% | 10.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 630) vs None (FirePro M7740). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs UVD 2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 630) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M7740).
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | FirePro M7740 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP5) | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 630 draws 75W versus the FirePro M7740's 33W — a 77.8% difference. The FirePro M7740 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 630) vs 350W (FirePro M7740). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 78 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | FirePro M7740 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 33W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 78-8% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 9.1 | 20.2+122% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 630 launched at $69 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the FirePro M7740 launched at $500 and now averages $500. The GeForce GT 630 costs 96% less ($480 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.3 (GeForce GT 630) vs 1.3 (FirePro M7740) — the GeForce GT 630 offers 2538.5% better value. The GeForce GT 630 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | FirePro M7740 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69-86% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-96% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.3+2538% | 1.3 |
| Codename | TU117 | Chelsea |
| Release | June 28 2022 | June 27 2012 |
| Ranking | #444 | #752 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 630 and FirePro M7740
