GeForce GT 630 vs Quadro K610M
GeForce GT 630
Popular choices:
Quadro K610M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 630 is positioned at rank 126 and the Quadro K610M is on rank 170, so the GeForce GT 630 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 630
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K610M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GT 630 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The GeForce GT 630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K610M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K610M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 630 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GT 630 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K610M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 630 and Quadro K610M
GeForce GT 630
The GeForce GT 630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 685 points.
Quadro K610M
The Quadro K610M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 714 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 630 scores 685 and the Quadro K610M reaches 714 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 630 is built on Turing while the Quadro K610M uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GT 630) vs 384 (Quadro K610M). Raw compute: 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 630) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K610M). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 685 | 714+4% |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.828 TFLOPS+112% | 0.8632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+59% | 1124 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+100% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 630 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K610M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 630 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 630 draws 75W versus the Quadro K610M's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro K610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 630) vs 350W (Quadro K610M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 78 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.1 | 23.8+162% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 630 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | GM108 |
| Release | June 28 2022 | March 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #444 | #842 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 630 and Quadro K610M
