
GeForce GT 630

NVS 510
GeForce GT 630 vs NVS 510 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 630 vs NVS 510 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GT 630 vs NVS 510: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 630
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $380 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 555.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($69 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅NVS 510 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 630 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 160mm, a 15mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
NVS 510
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌550.7% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$69 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 160mm vs 145mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 630 vs NVS 510 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 630
The GeForce GT 630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 685 points.

NVS 510
The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 630 scores 685 and the NVS 510 reaches 680 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 630 is built on Turing while the NVS 510 uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GT 630) vs 512 (NVS 510). Raw compute: 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 630) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 510). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 685 | 680 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 512 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.828 TFLOPS+73% | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+73% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 630 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The NVS 510 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 630 and 64-bit on the NVS 510.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 630) vs 12 (11_0) (NVS 510). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.2+20% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 630) vs 1st Gen NVENC (NVS 510). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 630) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (NVS 510).
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | 1st Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP5) | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 630 draws 75W versus the NVS 510's 68W — a 9.8% difference. The NVS 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 630) vs 350W (NVS 510). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 160mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 78 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 68W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 160mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 78 | 65°C-17% |
| Perf/Watt | 9.1 | 10.0+10% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 630 came in at $69, while the NVS 510 launched at $449. On MSRP, GeForce GT 630 was 84.6% cheaper ($380 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.9 (GeForce GT 630) vs 1.5 (NVS 510) — the GeForce GT 630 offers 560% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 630 (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69-85% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.9+560% | 1.5 |
| Codename | TU117 | GM107 |
| Release | June 28 2022 | November 4 2015 |
| Ranking | #444 | #826 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















