GeForce GT 630 vs NVS 510
GeForce GT 630
Popular choices:
NVS 510
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 630 is positioned at rank 126 and the NVS 510 is on rank 321, so the GeForce GT 630 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 630
Performance Per Dollar NVS 510
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GT 630 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The GeForce GT 630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The NVS 510 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the NVS 510.
| Insight | GeForce GT 630 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The NVS 510 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $20 for the GeForce GT 630, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 32.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 630 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+32.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 630 and NVS 510
GeForce GT 630
The GeForce GT 630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 685 points.
NVS 510
The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 630 scores 685 and the NVS 510 reaches 680 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 630 is built on Turing while the NVS 510 uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GT 630) vs 512 (NVS 510). Raw compute: 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 630) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 510). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 685 | 680 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 512 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.828 TFLOPS+73% | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+73% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 630) vs 12 (11_0) (NVS 510). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.2+20% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 630) vs 1st Gen NVENC (NVS 510). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 630) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (NVS 510).
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | 1st Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP5) | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 630 draws 75W versus the NVS 510's 68W — a 9.8% difference. The NVS 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 630) vs 350W (NVS 510). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 160mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 78 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 68W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 160mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 78 | 65°C-17% |
| Perf/Watt | 9.1 | 10.0+10% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 630 launched at $69 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the NVS 510 launched at $449 and now averages $15. The NVS 510 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.3 (GeForce GT 630) vs 45.3 (NVS 510) — the NVS 510 offers 32.1% better value. The GeForce GT 630 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | NVS 510 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69-85% | $449 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $15-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.3 | 45.3+32% |
| Codename | TU117 | GM107 |
| Release | June 28 2022 | November 4 2015 |
| Ranking | #444 | #826 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 630 and NVS 510
