
GeForce GT 630

Radeon HD 6550A
GeForce GT 630 vs Radeon HD 6550A Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 630 vs Radeon HD 6550A FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 630 vs Radeon HD 6550A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 630
2022Why buy it
- ✅69.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Radeon HD 6550A is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 630 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌130% HIGHER MSRP$69 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 23.6 G3D/$ ($69 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.
Radeon HD 6550A
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $39 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 137.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.6 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 630 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 630 vs Radeon HD 6550A Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 630
The GeForce GT 630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 685 points.

Radeon HD 6550A
The Radeon HD 6550A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 708 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 630 scores 685 and the Radeon HD 6550A reaches 708 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 630 is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 6550A uses TeraScale 2, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GT 630) vs 480 (Radeon HD 6550A). Raw compute: 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 630) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6550A).
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | Radeon HD 6550A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 685 | 708+3% |
| Architecture | Turing | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+7% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.828 TFLOPS+217% | 0.576 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+967% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 630 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6550A leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | Radeon HD 6550A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 630 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6550A carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 630 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 630 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6550A. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GT 630) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 6550A) — the GeForce GT 630 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | Radeon HD 6550A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 630 draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 6550A's 45W — a 50% difference. The Radeon HD 6550A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 630) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6550A). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | Radeon HD 6550A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 45W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 78 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.1 | 15.7+73% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 630 came in at $69, while the Radeon HD 6550A launched at $30. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6550A was 56.5% cheaper ($39 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.9 (GeForce GT 630) vs 23.6 (Radeon HD 6550A) — the Radeon HD 6550A offers 138.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 630 (2022 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce GT 630 | Radeon HD 6550A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $69 | $30-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.9 | 23.6+138% |
| Codename | TU117 | Onega |
| Release | June 28 2022 | April 19 2011 |
| Ranking | #444 | #926 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















