GeForce GT 630 vs GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 630

2022Core: 1740 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······

GeForce GT 630 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 630 vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 630 vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 630

2022

Why buy it

  • Costs $80 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • Measures 145mm instead of 229mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($69 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 433.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 432% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 57.9% longer card at 229mm vs 145mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 433.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1048.8% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 685), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $80 more expensive on MSRP at $149 vs $69, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 432% (52.8 vs 9.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 630 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 630

The GeForce GT 630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 685 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 630 scores 685 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 1048.8%. The GeForce GT 630 is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GT 630) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 630) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 630GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
685
7,869+1049%
Architecture
Turing
Turing
Process Node
12 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
512
896+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.828 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS+63%
Boost Clock
1785 MHz+7%
1665 MHz
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
56+75%
L1 Cache
512 KB
896 KB+75%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 630GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 630 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 630 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650.

FeatureGeForce GT 630GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
128 GB/s
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 630) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GT 630GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Vulkan
1.0
1.4+40%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 630) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 630) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce GT 630GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
None
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP5)
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 630 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 630) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 145mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78 vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 630GeForce GTX 1650
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
300W
300W
Power Connector
None
None
Length
145mm
229mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
78
70°C-10%
Perf/Watt
9.1
104.9+1053%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 630 came in at $69, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GT 630 was 53.7% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.9 (GeForce GT 630) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 433.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 630 (2022 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GT 630GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$69-54%
$149
Performance per Dollar
9.9
52.8+433%
Codename
TU117
TU117
Release
June 28 2022
April 23 2019
Ranking
#444
#323

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.