G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 630 vs GeForce RTX 4070 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 630 vs GeForce RTX 4070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 630

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $530 less on MSRP ($69 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.
✅Measures 145mm instead of 304mm, a 159mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($69 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅1372.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 352.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $69 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.
❌109.7% longer card at 304mm vs 145mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1372.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3829.8% in PassMark G3D (26,919 vs 685), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GT 630 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 12nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4070 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $530 more expensive on MSRP at $599 vs $69, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 352.7% (44.9 vs 9.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 630 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 630

The GeForce GT 630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 685 points.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 630 scores 685 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 3829.8%. The GeForce GT 630 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GT 630) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 630) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 2475 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GT 630	GeForce RTX 4070
G3D Mark Score	685	26,919+3830%
Architecture	Turing	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	512	5888+1050%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.828 TFLOPS	29.15 TFLOPS+1495%
Boost Clock	1785 MHz	2475 MHz+39%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	32	184+475%
L1 Cache	0.5 MB	5.8 MB+1060%
L2 Cache	1 MB	36 MB+3500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GT 630 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GT 630 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GT 630	GeForce RTX 4070
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 630 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 630 and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GT 630) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 630	GeForce RTX 4070
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	12 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	504 GB/s
Bus Width	64-bit	192-bit+200%
L2 Cache	1 MB	36 MB+3500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 630) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GT 630	GeForce RTX 4070
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.0	1.3+30%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 630) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 630) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).

Feature	GeForce GT 630	GeForce RTX 4070
Encoder	None	8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP5)	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 630 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce GT 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 630) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 304mm, occupying 1 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 78 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 630	GeForce RTX 4070
TDP	75W-63%	200W
Recommended PSU	300W-54%	650W
Power Connector	None	8-pin
Length	145mm	304mm
Height	111mm	137mm
Slots	1-67%	3
Temp (Load)	78-3%	80°C
Perf/Watt	9.1	134.6+1379%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 630 came in at $69, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce GT 630 was 88.5% cheaper ($530 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.9 (GeForce GT 630) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 353.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 (2023 vs 2022).

Feature	GeForce GT 630	GeForce RTX 4070
MSRP	$69-88%	$599
Performance per Dollar	9.9	44.9+354%
Codename	TU117	AD104
Release	June 28 2022	April 12 2023
Ranking	#444	#32

Search GeForce GT 630 on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 4070 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.