GeForce GT 640M LE vs GeForce GTS 160M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640M LE

2012Core: Up to 625 MHzBoost: 645 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 160M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 640M LE vs GeForce GTS 160M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 640M LE vs GeForce GTS 160M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 640M LE vs GeForce GTS 160M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 640M LE

2012

Why buy it

  • 3.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Draws 32W instead of 45W, a 13W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTS 160M

2012

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 640M LE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
  • 40.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 32W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 640M LE is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (697 vs 679), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 640M LE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 640M LE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GT 640M LE vs GeForce GTS 160M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640M LE

The GeForce GT 640M LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 625 MHz to 645 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 697 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 160M

The GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 679 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 640M LE scores 697 and the GeForce GTS 160M reaches 679 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640M LE is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTS 160M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640M LE) vs 384 (GeForce GTS 160M). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640M LE) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 160M). Boost clocks: 645 MHz vs 950 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 640M LEGeForce GTS 160M
G3D Mark Score
697+3%
679
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.48 TFLOPS
0.7296 TFLOPS+52%
Boost Clock
645 MHz
950 MHz+47%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
32 KB
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 640M LEGeForce GTS 160M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 640M LE has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTS 160M carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 640M LE gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 640M LE and 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 160M.

FeatureGeForce GT 640M LEGeForce GTS 160M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+100%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 640M LE) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 160M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 640M LEGeForce GTS 160M
DirectX
12 (11_0)+8%
11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL
4.6+39%
3.3
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GT 640M LE) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTS 160M). Decoder: VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 640M LE) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 160M).

FeatureGeForce GT 640M LEGeForce GTS 160M
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
PureVideo HD VP2
Decoder
VP5
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 640M LE draws 32W versus the GeForce GTS 160M's 45W — a 33.8% difference. The GeForce GT 640M LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 640M LE) vs 350W (GeForce GTS 160M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 90°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 640M LEGeForce GTS 160M
TDP
32W-29%
45W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85-6%
90°C
Perf/Watt
21.8+44%
15.1