GeForce GT 640M LE vs Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 640M LE vs Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 640M LE vs Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 640M LE

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 32W instead of 108W, a 76W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M

2009

Why buy it

✅17.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2009 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
❌237.5% higher power demand at 108W vs 32W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (699 vs 697), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 640M LE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2009. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 640M LE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 640M LE vs Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 640M LE

The GeForce GT 640M LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 625 MHz to 645 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 697 points.

Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M

The Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 699 points. Launch price was $159.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 640M LE scores 697 and the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M reaches 699 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640M LE is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640M LE) vs 800 (Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640M LE) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M).

Feature	GeForce GT 640M LE	Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
G3D Mark Score	697	699
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.48 TFLOPS	1.36 TFLOPS+183%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	32 KB	80 KB+150%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 640M LE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 640M LE	Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 640M LE has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 640M LE gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 640M LE and System on the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M.

Feature	GeForce GT 640M LE	Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 640M LE draws 32W versus the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M's 108W — a 108.6% difference. The GeForce GT 640M LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 640M LE) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GT 640M LE	Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
TDP	32W-70%	108W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85	—
Perf/Watt	21.8+235%	6.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 640M LE (2012 vs 2009).

Feature	GeForce GT 640M LE	Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
MSRP	$80	—
Codename	GK107	Juniper
Release	March 22 2012	October 13 2009
Ranking	#909	#730

Search GeForce GT 640M LE on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.