GeForce GT 640M LE vs Quadro K610M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640M LE

2012Core: Up to 625 MHzBoost: 645 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K610M

2015Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz

GeForce GT 640M LE vs Quadro K610M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 640M LE vs Quadro K610M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 640M LE vs Quadro K610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 640M LE

2012

Why buy it

  • βœ…Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • βœ…100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K610M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K610M

2015

Why buy it

  • βœ…45.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K610M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 45.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (714 vs 697), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 640M LE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 640M LE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro K610M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 640M LE vs Quadro K610M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640M LE

The GeForce GT 640M LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 625 MHz to 645 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 697 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K610M

The Quadro K610M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 714 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 640M LE scores 697 and the Quadro K610M reaches 714 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640M LE is built on Kepler while the Quadro K610M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640M LE) vs 384 (Quadro K610M). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640M LE) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K610M). Boost clocks: 645 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 640M LEQuadro K610M
G3D Mark Score
697
714+2%
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.48 TFLOPS
0.8632 TFLOPS+80%
Boost Clock
645 MHz
1124 MHz+74%
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+100%
16
L1 Cache
32 KB
128 KB+300%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 640M LE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K610M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 640M LEQuadro K610M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 640M LE has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K610M carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 640M LE gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 640M LE and 64-bit on the Quadro K610M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 640M LE) vs 1 MB (Quadro K610M) β€” the Quadro K610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 640M LEQuadro K610M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+100%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 640M LE draws 32W versus the Quadro K610M's 30W β€” a 6.5% difference. The Quadro K610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 640M LE) vs 350W (Quadro K610M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 640M LEQuadro K610M
TDP
32W
30W-6%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
β€”
Height
0mm
β€”
Slots
0
β€”
Temp (Load)
85
β€”
Perf/Watt
21.8
23.8+9%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K610M (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GT 640M LEQuadro K610M
MSRP
$80
β€”
Codename
GK107
GM108
Release
March 22 2012
March 1 2015
Ranking
#909
#842

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.