GeForce GT 640M LE vs Quadro FX 4700 X2

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640M LE

2012Core: Up to 625 MHzBoost: 645 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4700 X2

2008Core: 602 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 640M LE vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 640M LE vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 640M LE vs Quadro FX 4700 X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 640M LE

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,919 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 3765.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.7 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
  • Draws 32W instead of 150W, a 118W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 4700 X2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 4700 X2

2008

Why buy it

  • 40.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 3648.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,999 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 8.7 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
  • 368.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 32W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 4700 X2 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 40.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 640M LE instead at 697 vs 676, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 640M LE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 640M LE makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,919 cheaper on MSRP at $80 vs $2,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3765.2% (8.7 vs 0.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 4700 X2 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 640M LE vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640M LE

The GeForce GT 640M LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 625 MHz to 645 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 697 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4700 X2

The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 676 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 640M LE scores 697 and the Quadro FX 4700 X2 reaches 676 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640M LE is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640M LE) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640M LE) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4700 X2).

FeatureGeForce GT 640M LEQuadro FX 4700 X2
G3D Mark Score
697+3%
676
Architecture
Kepler
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384+100%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.48 TFLOPS+4%
0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
24+50%
TMUs
32
64+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB+33%
192 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 640M LE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 640M LEQuadro FX 4700 X2
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 640M LE has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 4700 X2 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 640M LE and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4700 X2. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 640M LE) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX 4700 X2) — the GeForce GT 640M LE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 640M LEQuadro FX 4700 X2
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+33%
192 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 640M LE draws 32W versus the Quadro FX 4700 X2's 150W — a 129.7% difference. The GeForce GT 640M LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 640M LE) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 640M LEQuadro FX 4700 X2
TDP
32W-79%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
21.8+384%
4.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 640M LE came in at $80, while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 launched at $2999. On MSRP, GeForce GT 640M LE was 97.3% cheaper ($2919 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.7 (GeForce GT 640M LE) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 4700 X2) — the GeForce GT 640M LE offers 4250% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 640M LE (2012 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GT 640M LEQuadro FX 4700 X2
MSRP
$80-97%
$2999
Performance per Dollar
8.7+4250%
0.2
Codename
GK107
GT200B
Release
March 22 2012
November 11 2008
Ranking
#909
#884

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.