GeForce GT 640M vs Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640M

2012Core: Up to 625 MHzBoost: 645 MHz
VS

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU

2018

GeForce GT 640M vs Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 640M vs Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 640M

2012

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GT 640M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 357.1% higher power demand at 32W vs 7W.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 7W instead of 32W, a 25W reduction.
  • More future proof: Unknown architecture on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 640M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (907 vs 889), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 640M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 640M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GT 640M vs Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 640M

The GeForce GT 640M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 625 MHz to 645 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 907 points.

Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 889 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 640M scores 907 and the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU reaches 889 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

FeatureGeForce GT 640MQualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
G3D Mark Score
907+2%
889
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 640M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 640MQualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 640M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU carries 0 MB. GeForce GT 640M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 640M and System on the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU.

FeatureGeForce GT 640MQualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 640M) vs 12_0 (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GT 640MQualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
DirectX
11.0
12_0+9%
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5+41%
3.2
Max Displays
1
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 640M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU).

FeatureGeForce GT 640MQualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
Encoder
NVENC 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 640M draws 32W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU's 7W — a 128.2% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 640M) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GT 640MQualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
TDP
32W
7W-78%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
0mm
1mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
28.3
127.0+349%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Qualcomm Adreno 685 GPU (2018 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GT 640MQualcomm Adreno 685 GPU
MSRP
$0
Codename
GK107
Release
March 22 2012
December 6 2018
Ranking
#909
#916

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.