
GeForce GT 640M

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
GeForce GT 640M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 640M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 640M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 640M
2012Why buy it
- β 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- β Draws 32W instead of 300W, a 268W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
2025Why buy it
- β 139.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Better long-term bet: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β837.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 32W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 640M vs Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 640M
The GeForce GT 640M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 625 MHz to 645 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 907 points.

Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the Bristol Ridge architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 921 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 640M scores 907 and the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E reaches 921 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E uses Bristol Ridge, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640M) vs 4,096 (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640M) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Boost clocks: 645 MHz vs 2920 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640M | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 907 | 921+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Bristol Ridge |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 4096+967% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.48 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+9867% |
| Boost Clock | 645 MHz | 2920 MHz+353% |
| ROPs | 16 | 128+700% |
| TMUs | 32 | 256+700% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 640M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640M | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 640M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 640M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 640M and System on the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 640M) vs 8 MB (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E) β the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640M | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 8 MB+3100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 640M draws 32W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E's 300W β a 161.4% difference. The GeForce GT 640M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 640M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640M | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 32W-89% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | β |
| Height | 0mm | β |
| Slots | 0 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 70Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 28.3+813% | 3.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E (2025 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 640M | Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | β | $139 |
| Codename | GK107 | Navi 48 |
| Release | March 22 2012 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #909 | #23 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















