
GeForce GT 640M vs Radeon HD 8570

GeForce GT 640M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 640M is positioned at rank 224 and the Radeon HD 8570 is on rank 136, so the Radeon HD 8570 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 640M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 640M.
| Insight | GeForce GT 640M | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8570 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $50), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 160.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 640M | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+160.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 640M and Radeon HD 8570

GeForce GT 640M
The GeForce GT 640M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 625 MHz to 645 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 907 points.

Radeon HD 8570
The Radeon HD 8570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 944 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 640M scores 907 and the Radeon HD 8570 reaches 944 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 640M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 8570 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 640M) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8570). Raw compute: 0.48 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 640M) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8570).
| Feature | GeForce GT 640M | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 907 | 944+4% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1280+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.48 TFLOPS | 2.56 TFLOPS+433% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 80+150% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 320 KB+900% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 640M | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 640M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8570) — the Radeon HD 8570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640M | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 640M) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 8570). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640M | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (11_1)+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.1+10% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5+5% | 4.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 640M) vs No (Radeon HD 8570). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 640M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon HD 8570).
| Feature | GeForce GT 640M | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 640M draws 32W versus the Radeon HD 8570's 200W — a 144.8% difference. The GeForce GT 640M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 640M) vs 300W (Radeon HD 8570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640M | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 32W-84% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 28.3+502% | 4.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8570 costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.1 (GeForce GT 640M) vs 47.2 (Radeon HD 8570) — the Radeon HD 8570 offers 160.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GT 640M | Radeon HD 8570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $20-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.1 | 47.2+161% |
| Codename | GK107 | Pitcairn |
| Release | March 22 2012 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #909 | #460 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















