G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 645 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 645 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 645

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $61 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
✅Delivers 63.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 20.3 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $160 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 32W instead of 150W, a 118W reduction.
✅Measures 145mm instead of 210mm, a 65mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 460 SE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTX 460 SE

2010

Why buy it

✅101.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
61.6% HIGHER MSRP
$160 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 20.3 G3D/$ ($160 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌368.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 32W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 460 SE is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 101.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 645 instead at 2,006 vs 1,988, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 645 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 645 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $61 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $160, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 63.1% (20.3 vs 12.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX 460 SE still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 645 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 645

The GeForce GT 645 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 710 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 32W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,006 points.

GeForce GTX 460 SE

The GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,988 points. Launch price was $160.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 645 scores 2,006 and the GeForce GTX 460 SE reaches 1,988 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 645 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 460 SE uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 645) vs 288 (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Raw compute: 0.5445 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 645) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 SE).

Feature	GeForce GT 645	GeForce GTX 460 SE
G3D Mark Score	2,006	1,988
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384+33%	288
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5445 TFLOPS	0.7488 TFLOPS+38%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	48+50%
L1 Cache	32 KB	384 KB+1100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 645	GeForce GTX 460 SE
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 645 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 SE carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 645 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 645 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 460 SE. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 645) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 460 SE) — the GeForce GTX 460 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 645	GeForce GTX 460 SE
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 645) vs 12.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 645	GeForce GTX 460 SE
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 645) vs UVD 4.0 (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Decoder: NVDEC (1st Gen) vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 645) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 460 SE).

Feature	GeForce GT 645	GeForce GTX 460 SE
Encoder	NVENC (1st Gen)	UVD 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (1st Gen)	PureVideo VP4
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 645 draws 32W versus the GeForce GTX 460 SE's 150W — a 129.7% difference. The GeForce GT 645 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 645) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 210mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 645	GeForce GTX 460 SE
TDP	32W-79%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	145mm	210mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	80	80°C
Perf/Watt	62.7+371%	13.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 645 came in at $99, while the GeForce GTX 460 SE launched at $160. On MSRP, GeForce GT 645 was 38.1% cheaper ($61 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.3 (GeForce GT 645) vs 12.4 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) — the GeForce GT 645 offers 63.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 645 (2012 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GT 645	GeForce GTX 460 SE
MSRP	$99-38%	$160
Performance per Dollar	20.3+64%	12.4
Codename	GK107	GF104
Release	October 1 2012	November 15 2010
Ranking	#903	#683

Search GeForce GT 645 on Amazon

Search GeForce GTX 460 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.