GeForce GT 740M vs Radeon R7 A365

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 740M

2014Core: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A365

2014Core: 725 MHzBoost: 825 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 740M vs Radeon R7 A365 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 740M vs Radeon R7 A365 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 740M vs Radeon R7 A365: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 740M

2014

Why buy it

  • 0.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
  • 113.3% higher power demand at 64W vs 30W.

Radeon R7 A365

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 64W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 740M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 740M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (782 vs 781), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 740M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 A365 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 A365 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 740M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 740M vs Radeon R7 A365 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 740M

The GeForce GT 740M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 782 points. Launch price was $89.

AMD

Radeon R7 A365

The Radeon R7 A365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 781 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 740M scores 782 and the Radeon R7 A365 reaches 781 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 740M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 A365 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 740M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A365). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 740M) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A365).

FeatureGeForce GT 740MRadeon R7 A365
G3D Mark Score
782
781
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS+20%
0.6336 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
32 KB
96 KB+200%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 740M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 A365 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 740MRadeon R7 A365
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 740M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A365 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 740M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 740M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A365.

FeatureGeForce GT 740MRadeon R7 A365
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 740M) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon R7 A365). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GT 740MRadeon R7 A365
DirectX
11.0
12 (FL 12_0)+9%
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.2
4.6+10%
Max Displays
1
3+200%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 740M) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 A365). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce GT 740M) vs H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 A365).

FeatureGeForce GT 740MRadeon R7 A365
Encoder
NVENC 1.0
VCE 3.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
UVD 6.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265
H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 740M draws 64W versus the Radeon R7 A365's 30W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon R7 A365 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 740M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A365). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 740MRadeon R7 A365
TDP
64W
30W-53%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
12.2
26.0+113%