
GeForce GT 740M

Radeon R7 A365
GeForce GT 740M vs Radeon R7 A365 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 740M vs Radeon R7 A365 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 740M vs Radeon R7 A365: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 740M
2014Why buy it
- ✅0.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 64W vs 30W.
Radeon R7 A365
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 64W, a 34W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 740M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 740M vs Radeon R7 A365 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 740M
The GeForce GT 740M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 782 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon R7 A365
The Radeon R7 A365 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 781 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 740M scores 782 and the Radeon R7 A365 reaches 781 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 740M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 A365 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 740M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 A365). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 740M) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A365).
| Feature | GeForce GT 740M | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 782 | 781 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS+20% | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 96 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 740M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 A365 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 740M | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 740M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A365 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 740M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 740M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A365.
| Feature | GeForce GT 740M | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 740M) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon R7 A365). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 740M | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (FL 12_0)+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6+10% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 740M) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R7 A365). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce GT 740M) vs H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R7 A365).
| Feature | GeForce GT 740M | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 | H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 740M draws 64W versus the Radeon R7 A365's 30W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon R7 A365 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 740M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A365). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 740M | Radeon R7 A365 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W | 30W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 12.2 | 26.0+113% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














