GeForce GT 740M
VS
Radeon R7 M270

GeForce GT 740M vs Radeon R7 M270

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 740M

2014Core: 993 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M270

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 940 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 740M is positioned at rank 91 and the Radeon R7 M270 is on rank 609, so the GeForce GT 740M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 740M

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
464%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
446%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
440%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
440%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
439%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
436%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
431%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
429%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
425%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
424%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
419%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
418%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
410%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
410%
#76
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
512%
#79
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
MSRP: $55|Avg: $40
93%
#80
GeForce RTX 5090
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $2700
92%
#81
Moore Threads MTT S80
MSRP: $260|Avg: $170
88%
#82
Intel UHD Graphics P750
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
79%
#83
Radeon Ryzen 7 4700G
MSRP: $299|Avg: $100
78%
#91
GeForce GT 740M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#92
Radeon HD 7730
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
99%
#93
Radeon 540
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
94%
#97
Radeon R7 A8-7690K
MSRP: $80|Avg: $40
91%
#98
GeForce GT 1010
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
89%
#99
Radeon R7 430
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
88%
#101
Radeon 550X
MSRP: $109|Avg: $45
87%
#102
GeForce GT 720
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
86%
#103
Radeon R7 240
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
84%
#104
Radeon R7 G
MSRP: $69|Avg: $51
81%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M270

#599
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
4208%
#601
3815%
#602
3805%
#606
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3460%
#607
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3436%
#609
Radeon R7 M270
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#610
GeForce 9800 GTX
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
100%
#611
Mobility Radeon HD 5850
MSRP: $299|Avg: $30
99%
#612
99%
#614
GeForce 205
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#615
GeForce 9600 GSO
MSRP: $129|Avg: $25
97%
#616
GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $40
97%
#617
GeForce 9400
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
97%
#618
GeForce 7350 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
96%
#620
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
95%
#621
Mobility Radeon HD 4870
MSRP: $299|Avg: $20
93%
#622
GeForce 9800M GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $5
92%
#623
91%
#624
Radeon HD 8550G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 740M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R7 M270.

InsightGeForce GT 740MRadeon R7 M270
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 740M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 740M and Radeon R7 M270

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 740M

The GeForce GT 740M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 782 points. Launch price was $89.

AMD

Radeon R7 M270

The Radeon R7 M270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 11 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 940 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 740M scores 782 and the Radeon R7 M270 reaches 775 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 740M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 M270 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 740M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M270). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 740M) vs 0.7219 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M270).

FeatureGeForce GT 740MRadeon R7 M270
G3D Mark Score
782
775
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS+6%
0.7219 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
32 KB
96 KB+200%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 740MRadeon R7 M270
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 740M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M270 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 740M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 740MRadeon R7 M270
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 740M) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M270). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 740MRadeon R7 M270
DirectX
11.0
12 (11_1)+9%
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.2
4.6+10%
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GT 740M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M270). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce GT 740M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon R7 M270).

FeatureGeForce GT 740MRadeon R7 M270
Encoder
NVENC 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
UVD 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 740M draws 64W versus the Radeon R7 M270's 75W — a 15.8% difference. The GeForce GT 740M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 740M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M270). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 740MRadeon R7 M270
TDP
64W-15%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
12.2+18%
10.3