GeForce GT 740M vs Radeon R7 A8-7600

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 740M

2014Core: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7600

2023Core: 1720 MHzBoost: 2655 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 740M vs Radeon R7 A8-7600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 740M vs Radeon R7 A8-7600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 740M vs Radeon R7 A8-7600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 740M

2014

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 64W instead of 165W, a 101W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 A8-7600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $119 MSRP).

Radeon R7 A8-7600

2023

Why buy it

  • 103.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 157.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 A8-7600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 103.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 740M instead at 782 vs 775, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 A8-7600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 32 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2014. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 A8-7600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GT 740M vs Radeon R7 A8-7600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 740M

The GeForce GT 740M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 782 points. Launch price was $89.

AMD

Radeon R7 A8-7600

The Radeon R7 A8-7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points. Launch price was $269.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 740M scores 782 and the Radeon R7 A8-7600 reaches 775 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 740M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 A8-7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 740M) vs 2,048 (Radeon R7 A8-7600). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 740M) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7600).

FeatureGeForce GT 740MRadeon R7 A8-7600
G3D Mark Score
782
775
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
384
2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS
21.75 TFLOPS+2752%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
32
128+300%
L1 Cache
32 KB
512 KB+1500%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 740M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 A8-7600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 740MRadeon R7 A8-7600
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 740M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A8-7600 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 740M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 740M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-7600. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 740M) vs 2 MB (Radeon R7 A8-7600) — the Radeon R7 A8-7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 740MRadeon R7 A8-7600
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
2 MB+700%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 740M draws 64W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7600's 165W — a 88.2% difference. The GeForce GT 740M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 740M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7600). Power connectors: None vs None.

FeatureGeForce GT 740MRadeon R7 A8-7600
TDP
64W-61%
165W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
None
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
12.2+160%
4.7
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 A8-7600 (2023 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GT 740MRadeon R7 A8-7600
MSRP
$119
Codename
GK107
Navi 33
Release
May 29 2014
May 24 2023
Ranking
#777
#118

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.