GeForce GTS 150M
VS
GeForce GT 425M

GeForce GTS 150M vs GeForce GT 425M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 150M

2010Core: 783 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 425M

2013Core: 549 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTS 150M is positioned at rank 78 and the GeForce GT 425M is on rank 159, so the GeForce GTS 150M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTS 150M

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
288%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
277%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
273%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
273%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
272%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
271%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
267%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
266%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
264%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
263%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
260%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
259%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
255%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
255%
#63
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
317%
#76
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800H
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
96%
#77
GeForce RTX 4090
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1649
92%
#78
GeForce GTS 150M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#78
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1100
83%
#83
Radeon R9 A375
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
83%
#85
81%
#86
Radeon R5 A6-7480
MSRP: $35|Avg: $30
79%
#87
GeForce GT 710
MSRP: $35|Avg: $50
70%
#89
GeForce GT 740
MSRP: $89|Avg: $89
64%
#90
Radeon R7 A8-7680
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
63%
#92
Radeon HD 7730
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
62%
#93
Radeon 540
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
58%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 425M

#42
Radeon RX 6600S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#43
Radeon RX 8060S
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
96%
#149
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
326%
#151
296%
#152
295%
#156
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
268%
#157
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
266%
#159
GeForce GT 425M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
100%
#172
GeForce GT 540M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTS 150M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 425M.

InsightGeForce GTS 150MGeForce GT 425M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTS 150M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTS 150M and GeForce GT 425M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 150M

The GeForce GTS 150M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 504 points. Launch price was $129.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 425M

The GeForce GT 425M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 499 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 150M scores 504 and the GeForce GT 425M reaches 499 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 150M is built on Fermi while the GeForce GT 425M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 150M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 425M). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 150M) vs 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 425M).

FeatureGeForce GTS 150MGeForce GT 425M
G3D Mark Score
504+1%
499
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
192
384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6013 TFLOPS+43%
0.4216 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
256 KB+700%
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTS 150MGeForce GT 425M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTS 150MGeForce GT 425M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 150M) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 425M). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce GTS 150MGeForce GT 425M
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
11.0
OpenGL
2.1
4.0+90%
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTS 150M) vs No (GeForce GT 425M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 150M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 425M).

FeatureGeForce GTS 150MGeForce GT 425M
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP2
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 150M draws 106W versus the GeForce GT 425M's 45W — a 80.8% difference. The GeForce GT 425M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 150M) vs 350W (GeForce GT 425M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTS 150MGeForce GT 425M
TDP
106W
45W-58%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
4.8
11.1+131%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 425M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTS 150MGeForce GT 425M
Avg Price (30d)
$25
Codename
GF106
GK107
Release
September 13 2010
April 1 2013
Ranking
#791
#857