
GeForce GTS 150M

GeForce GTS 240
GeForce GTS 150M vs GeForce GTS 240 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTS 150M vs GeForce GTS 240 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTS 150M vs GeForce GTS 240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTS 150M
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTS 240 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
GeForce GTS 240
2010Why buy it
- ✅5.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTS 150M vs GeForce GTS 240 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTS 150M
The GeForce GTS 150M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 504 points. Launch price was $129.

GeForce GTS 240
The GeForce GTS 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $129.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 150M scores 504 and the GeForce GTS 240 reaches 515 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 150M is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTS 240 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 150M) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 240). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 150M) vs 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 240).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 150M | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 504 | 515+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 0.6013 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTS 150M | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 150M and 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 240.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 150M | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 150M) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 240). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 150M | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.2+52% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTS 150M) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTS 240). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 150M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 240).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 150M | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 150M draws 106W versus the GeForce GTS 240's 106W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTS 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 150M) vs 350W (GeForce GTS 240). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 150M | GeForce GTS 240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W | 106W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.8 | 4.9+2% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













