GeForce GTS 150M vs Radeon R7 M265DX

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 150M

2010Core: 783 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M265DX

2014
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTS 150M vs Radeon R7 M265DX Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTS 150M vs Radeon R7 M265DX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTS 150M vs Radeon R7 M265DX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTS 150M

2010

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M265DX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 41.3% higher power demand at 106W vs 75W.

Radeon R7 M265DX

2014

Why buy it

  • 41.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 106W, a 31W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 M265DX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 41.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTS 150M instead at 504 vs 499, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTS 150M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 M265DX makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M265DX is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTS 150M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTS 150M vs Radeon R7 M265DX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 150M

The GeForce GTS 150M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 504 points. Launch price was $129.

AMD

Radeon R7 M265DX

The Radeon R7 M265DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2014. It features the GCN architecture. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 499 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTS 150M scores 504 and the Radeon R7 M265DX reaches 499 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 150M is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 M265DX uses GCN, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 150M) vs 896 (Radeon R7 M265DX).

FeatureGeForce GTS 150MRadeon R7 M265DX
G3D Mark Score
504+1%
499
Architecture
Fermi
GCN
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
192
896+367%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTS 150M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 M265DX leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTS 150MRadeon R7 M265DX
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTS 150M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M265DX carries 512 MB. GeForce GTS 150M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 150M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M265DX.

FeatureGeForce GTS 150MRadeon R7 M265DX
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 150M) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M265DX). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GTS 150MRadeon R7 M265DX
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_1)+8%
OpenGL
2.1
4.6+119%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTS 150M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 M265DX). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 150M) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon R7 M265DX).

FeatureGeForce GTS 150MRadeon R7 M265DX
Encoder
PureVideo HD VP2
VCE 2.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
UVD 4.0
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTS 150M draws 106W versus the Radeon R7 M265DX's 75W — a 34.3% difference. The Radeon R7 M265DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 150M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M265DX). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.

FeatureGeForce GTS 150MRadeon R7 M265DX
TDP
106W
75W-29%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
85
Perf/Watt
4.8
6.7+40%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 M265DX (2014 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GTS 150MRadeon R7 M265DX
MSRP
$149
Codename
GF106
Release
September 13 2010
June 4 2014
Ranking
#791
#800

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.