
GeForce GTS 150M

Radeon R7 M265DX
GeForce GTS 150M vs Radeon R7 M265DX Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTS 150M vs Radeon R7 M265DX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTS 150M vs Radeon R7 M265DX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTS 150M
2010Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M265DX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌41.3% higher power demand at 106W vs 75W.
Radeon R7 M265DX
2014Why buy it
- ✅41.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 106W, a 31W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTS 150M vs Radeon R7 M265DX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTS 150M
The GeForce GTS 150M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 504 points. Launch price was $129.

Radeon R7 M265DX
The Radeon R7 M265DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2014. It features the GCN architecture. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 499 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTS 150M scores 504 and the Radeon R7 M265DX reaches 499 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTS 150M is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 M265DX uses GCN, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 150M) vs 896 (Radeon R7 M265DX).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 150M | Radeon R7 M265DX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 504+1% | 499 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 896+367% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTS 150M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 M265DX leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 150M | Radeon R7 M265DX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 150M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M265DX carries 512 MB. GeForce GTS 150M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 150M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M265DX.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 150M | Radeon R7 M265DX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 150M) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M265DX). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 150M | Radeon R7 M265DX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1)+8% |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6+119% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTS 150M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 M265DX). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 150M) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon R7 M265DX).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 150M | Radeon R7 M265DX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 150M draws 106W versus the Radeon R7 M265DX's 75W — a 34.3% difference. The Radeon R7 M265DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 150M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M265DX). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 150M | Radeon R7 M265DX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W | 75W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 4.8 | 6.7+40% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R7 M265DX (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 150M | Radeon R7 M265DX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $149 |
| Codename | GF106 | — |
| Release | September 13 2010 | June 4 2014 |
| Ranking | #791 | #800 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














