GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

2018Core: 1190 MHzBoost: 1328 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

2018

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 93.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 93.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 100.5% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 3,925), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 14nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1190 MHz to 1328 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,925 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q scores 3,925 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 100.5%. The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.7 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1328 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Max-QGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
3,925
7,869+100%
Architecture
Pascal
Turing
Process Node
14 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
640
896+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.7 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS+76%
Boost Clock
1328 MHz
1665 MHz+25%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
40
56+40%
L1 Cache
240 KB
896 KB+273%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Max-QGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 112.1 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 14.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Max-QGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
128 GB/s+14%
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Max-QGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Max-QGeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
NVENC (6th Gen)
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
NVDEC (3rd Gen)
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Max-QGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
75W
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
70°C-7%
Perf/Watt
52.3
104.9+101%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2018).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Max-QGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$149
Codename
GP107
TU117
Release
January 3 2018
April 23 2019
Ranking
#498
#323

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.