
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs GRID P6-2Q

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Popular choices:

GRID P6-2Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is positioned at rank 76 and the GRID P6-2Q is on rank 296, so the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Performance Per Dollar GRID P6-2Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID P6-2Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P6-2Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID P6-2Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and GRID P6-2Q

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1190 MHz to 1328 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,925 points.

GRID P6-2Q
The GRID P6-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,926 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q scores 3,925 and the GRID P6-2Q reaches 3,926 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the GRID P6-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs 2,048 (GRID P6-2Q). Raw compute: 1.7 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P6-2Q). Boost clocks: 1328 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,925 | 3,926 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2048+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.7 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+184% |
| Boost Clock | 1328 MHz+13% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 128+220% |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 768 KB+220% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs 2 MB (GRID P6-2Q) — the GRID P6-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs 12 (12_1) (GRID P6-2Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs NVENC 4 (GRID P6-2Q). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs NVDEC 3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs H.264,H.265 (GRID P6-2Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | NVENC 4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | NVDEC 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q draws 75W versus the GRID P6-2Q's 225W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs 350W (GRID P6-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-67% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 52.3+201% | 17.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | GRID P6-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $150 |
| Codename | GP107 | GM204 |
| Release | January 3 2018 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #498 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















