GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is positioned at rank #76 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

#25

Radeon RX 7600M XT

MSRP: $329|Avg: $300

91%

#66

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

221%

#68

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

201%

#69

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

200%

#73

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

182%

#74

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

181%

#76

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#78

Radeon HD 8970M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $170

99%

#82

Arc 7-Core iGPU

MSRP: $199|Avg: N/A

96%

#86

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

MSRP: $99|Avg: $50

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 750 Ti Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 750 Ti

GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1190 MHz to 1328 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,925 points.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q scores 3,925 and the GeForce GTX 750 Ti reaches 3,900 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 750 Ti uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Raw compute: 1.7 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Boost clocks: 1328 MHz vs 1085 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	GeForce GTX 750 Ti
G3D Mark Score	3,925	3,900
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.7 TFLOPS+22%	1.389 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1328 MHz+22%	1085 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	40
L1 Cache	240 KB	320 KB+33%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112.1 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs 86.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) — a 29.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	GeForce GTX 750 Ti
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	112.1 GB/s+30%	86.4 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	GeForce GTX 750 Ti
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Encoder	NVENC (6th Gen)	NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder	NVDEC (3rd Gen)	PureVideo HD
Codecs	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 750 Ti's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65.