GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 965M SLI
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is positioned at rank 76 and the GeForce GTX 965M SLI is on rank 205, so the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 965M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 965M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 965M SLI
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1190 MHz to 1328 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,925 points.
GeForce GTX 965M SLI
The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,010 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q scores 3,925 and the GeForce GTX 965M SLI reaches 4,010 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 965M SLI uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs 2,048 (GeForce GTX 965M SLI). Boost clocks: 1328 MHz vs 950 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,925 | 4,010+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2048+220% |
| Boost Clock | 1328 MHz+40% | 950 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 112.1 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs 80.2 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 965M SLI) — a 39.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit x2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s+40% | 80.2 GB/s x2 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit x2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 965M SLI's 75W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX 965M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 965M SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 965M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 52.3 | 53.5+2% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 965M SLI
