GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) vs Radeon 760M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

2020

Why buy it

✅+8.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,449 vs 5,918).

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

2020

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅+8.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,449 vs 5,918).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) better than Radeon 760M?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 5,918 vs 5,449 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is a 2020 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon 760M is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 760M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2020, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 8.6% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon 760M still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

When does Radeon 760M make more sense than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)?

Yes. Radeon 760M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 50W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile). The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) currently gives you 8.6% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) Benchmark Check

Radeon 760M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	90 FPS	46 FPS
medium	80 FPS	29 FPS
high	67 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	83 FPS	32 FPS
medium	71 FPS	19 FPS
high	56 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	46 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	39 FPS	12 FPS
medium	36 FPS	8 FPS
high	25 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	22 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Open Radeon 760M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	144 FPS	91 FPS
medium	122 FPS	64 FPS
high	103 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	30 FPS
1440p
low	85 FPS	58 FPS
medium	67 FPS	38 FPS
high	52 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	21 FPS
4K
low	37 FPS	30 FPS
medium	28 FPS	21 FPS
high	22 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	17 FPS	11 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Open Radeon 760M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	266 FPS	245 FPS
medium	213 FPS	196 FPS
high	178 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	123 FPS
1440p
low	200 FPS	184 FPS
medium	160 FPS	147 FPS
high	133 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	123 FPS
medium	107 FPS	98 FPS
high	89 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Open Radeon 760M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	256 FPS	154 FPS
medium	205 FPS	120 FPS
high	176 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	133 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	196 FPS	109 FPS
medium	155 FPS	87 FPS
high	127 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	96 FPS	65 FPS
medium	73 FPS	52 FPS
high	64 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	30 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)Open Radeon 760M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) and Radeon 760M

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,918 points.

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) scores 5,918 versus the Radeon 760M's 5,449 — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) leads by 8.6%. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 2599 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score	5,918+9%	5,449
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	1024+100%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.041 TFLOPS	5.323 TFLOPS+75%
Boost Clock	1485 MHz	2599 MHz+75%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	64+100%	32
L1 Cache	1 MB+669%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 760M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	112 GB/s	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon 760M
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon 760M
Encoder	NVENC (6th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (3rd Gen)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.