
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7990
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 7990: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 7990 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 375W, a 325W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Radeon HD 7990
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌650% higher power demand at 375W vs 50W.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
2020Radeon HD 7990
2013Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon HD 7990: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon HD 7990 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 375W, a 325W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌650% higher power demand at 375W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) better than Radeon HD 7990?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 7990 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 16 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 63 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) and Radeon HD 7990

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,918 points.

Radeon HD 7990
Radeon HD 7990
The Radeon HD 7990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,566 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) scores 5,918 versus the Radeon HD 7990's 5,566 — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) leads by 6.3%. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the Radeon HD 7990 uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7990). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 7990). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,918+6% | 5,566 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048 ×2+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.041 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS ×2+35% |
| Boost Clock | 1485 MHz+49% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128 ×2+100% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 7990 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7990 has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 288 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 7990) — a 2473.2% advantage for the Radeon HD 7990. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit x2. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 7990) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 288 GB/s x2+157% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit x2+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7990). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 5+25% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7990). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon HD 7990).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 7990's 375W — a 152.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 750W (Radeon HD 7990). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-87% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-53% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 305mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 118.4+700% | 14.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $999 |
| Codename | TU116 | Malta |
| Release | April 23 2020 | April 24 2013 |
| Ranking | #324 | #412 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













