
GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 480
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is positioned at rank #66 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is significantly newer (2018 vs 2010). The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 480 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 480 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $100 for the GeForce GTX 480, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 92.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+92.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design and GeForce GTX 480

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,925 points.

GeForce GTX 480
The GeForce GTX 480 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,075 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design scores 3,925 and the GeForce GTX 480 reaches 4,075 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 480 uses Fermi, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs 480 (GeForce GTX 480). Raw compute: 2.177 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 480).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,925 | 4,075+4% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+60% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.177 TFLOPS+62% | 1.345 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 48 | 60+25% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 960 KB+233% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 480 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 80 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs 177.4 GB/s (GeForce GTX 480) — a 121.8% advantage for the GeForce GTX 480. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 480) — the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+167% | 1.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 177.4 GB/s+122% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 480). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 480). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 480).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 480's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 480). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-70% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-22% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.3+221% | 16.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design costs 50% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 78.5 (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs 40.8 (GeForce GTX 480) — the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design offers 92.4% better value. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-50% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 78.5+92% | 40.8 |
| Codename | GP107 | GF100 |
| Release | January 3 2018 | March 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #429 | #488 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















